Archive for March, 2009

Challenges mount for Malaysia’s najib Altantuya; Bad days ahead for all Malaysians

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Among activists and dissidents, there is a sense of foreboding that Najib and the new UMNO leadership will resort to authoritarian measures to affirm their grip on power.

By Anil Netto, Asia Times Online

Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak took a big step towards taking over the premiership when he was returned unopposed this week as president of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), the dominant party in Malaysia’s ruling coalition. His men also bagged most of the leadership posts in the recently concluded party elections. As head of the UMNO, Najib automatically becomes premier, although a formal handover date has yet to be announced.

Najib has been hammering home a message of change and reform, but many Malaysians wonder what his vision might entail. There is little doubt that UMNO needs to reform after the ruling coalition suffered a severe setback in last March’s general election. The long dominant party lost its coveted two-thirds parliamentary majority at those polls, while five of the federation’s 13 states fell to the opposition. It represented the party’s worst setback since independence from Britain in 1957.

Many Malaysians, especially those exposed to independent online media and critical blogs, have grown tired of accounts of corruption, abuse of power, rent-seeking and the perpetual undermining of government institutions by UMNO-led governments. Meanwhile, minorities and disadvantaged groups have started to more strongly assert their rights.

Najib is taking over power at a challenging time for the country, both politically and economically. Malaysia’s trade-oriented economy is on the brink of recession, with exports and manufacturing both slumping badly. Within his party, there’s a sense of siege as a resurgent opposition alliance, led by Anwar Ibrahim, continues to challenge the ruling coalition’s eroded dominance.

Among activists and dissidents, there is a sense of foreboding that Najib and the new UMNO leadership will resort to authoritarian measures to affirm their grip on power. Outgoing premier Abdullah Badawi, who was blamed for the coalition’s poor showing at last year’s election and forced out of the UMNO’s presidency by party chieftains, warned the party against resorting to its old ways, which some commentators have referred to as a return to “Mahathirism”.

There are ominous signs Najib will aim to model his premiership after former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad’s 22-year tenure. In moves reminiscent of Mahathir’s heavy-handed rule, police have in recent days disrupted opposition rallies, while two opposition party newspapers were suspended for three months.

“Sadly, there are still those who feel that we do not need to pursue reforms,” lamented Abdullah in his farewell speech to the party’s annual general assembly. “They believe that UMNO will regain its glory if we revert to the old ways – the old order, by restricting the freedom of our citizens and by silencing their criticism.”

Abdullah warned that if the party returned to the old path, it would lead to regression and decay. “It is a path that I fear will hasten our demise. If we do not take courageous steps to reform in the face of this dynamic transformation of society and the radical global changes taking place, then we shall live to witness the end of our beloved UMNO. What is the point of fighting tooth and nail for positions in the party if all that remains of us is an obsolete husk?”

Politics of reform
On Abdullah’s rise in 2003, few UMNO delegates seemed keen to stay the course of Mahathir’s authoritarian era. Against the odds, they picked Abdullah’s ambitious son-in-law Khairy Jamuluddin over Mahathir’s son Mukhriz for the leadership of the party’s influential youth wing. Khairy, more than the other youth leaders, had been speaking the language of liberal reforms, though he had also played the communal card in his rise up the party ranks.

Mahathir failed to show up at the assembly after his son lost and started a campaign of criticism against the party he once led. The former premier, who handpicked Abdullah as his successor, but later locked horns with him over his style of governance and decision to scrap infrastructure projects Mahathir had approved, has warned that UMNO has become a party of the corrupt. “Whether it is the members or the leaders, all of them are out there for their own self-interest,” he recently said.

The just-concluded party election process should have instilled confidence among the people that UMNO was prepared to fight corruption, Mahathir said. “But what has happened shows that UMNO does not care about reforming the party and winning the 13th general election. They are more interested in becoming UMNO leaders using any means. Their hope is that if they become UMNO leaders, they would become Cabinet Ministers and obtain contracts and other benefits for their self interest.”

Those are strong words coming from a man whose own 22-year tenure was plagued by scandal after scandal – but all the same worth listening to, as Mahathir has intimate knowledge of how the UMNO works. For instance, Mahathir claimed that many of the nominations for the party’s Supreme Council by the party’s divisions were the result of “offers”. “Many of those nominated were widely known to have bought votes,” he alleged.

Najib has a chance to repair the party, said Mahathir, by refusing to appoint those tainted by corruption to his Cabinet when he takes over as prime minister. However, there is also the matter of public perception – beginning with Najib, who has been implicated in blogs and opposition media in the sensational murder of a Mongolian woman interpreter.

Najib, for his part, strenuously denies any involvement but has not sued his critics nor testified in the ongoing murder trial, in which two special forces operatives linked to him have been charged with the murder. The scandal has brought shame to the nation and damaged the country’s international credibility, according to the sidelined UMNO veteran Razaleigh Hamzah, who had earlier announced he was in the running for the party’s leadership.

“For the honor of the nation, for the honor of the office of prime minister, for the honor of the sovereign institutions expected to endorse, confirm and lend authority to him should he become prime minister according to UMNO’s plans, [he] should finally face these suspicions and implied charges, submit himself to legal scrutiny, and come clean on them,” Razaleigh said.

He claimed the country had fallen into a spiral of institutional and economic decline and that the next government “must not only be fully committed to restoring the legislature, the judiciary and the rulers to their proper dignity and independence, it must be seen by the Malaysian public to be capable of doing so”.

No matter what UMNO does, the race-based politics the ruling coalition has perpetuated since independence is less appealing to a younger generation of Malaysians who are less influenced by the state-manipulated media. This has prompted Khairy to suggest offering Malaysians direct membership to the ruling coalition instead of via the main race-based parties.

Zaid Ibrahim, a former cabinet minister in the Abdullah administration who stepped down due to the slow pace of promised democratic reforms, is confident that Malaysia will more towards a more pluralistic society through the forces of globalization. Yet he warned: “We will not succeed in promoting a united country and allow for the evolution of Bangsa Malaysia [a Malaysian race] if we do not subscribe to the rule of law. We need the openness, freedom and social justice that will be possible only with [the rule of law] in place and democracy.”

All eyes now are on the transition from Abdullah to Najib and the composition of Najib’s new cabinet. Depending on how those appointments are publicly received, Najib’s first big test will likely come in three hotly contested by-elections on April 7. UMNO has in recent months lost crucial by-elections, in which Najib helped campaign, to Anwar’s National Alliance. Not only will the upcoming polls be viewed as a public referendum on the ruling coalition, but the first measure of public opinion on Najib’s ascension to Malaysia’s top political spot.

Anil Netto is a Penang-based writer.

My name is RPK, I am Malaysian, and I am no prostitute

Posted in RPK with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Yes, I am no prostitute. And all those Malays who justify joining Umno for business reasons, and those Chinese and Indians who say they support Barisan Nasional to cari makan, are worse than prostitutes.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

I remember something my late mother once told me back in 1960 or thereabouts: a house is not a home. A home is a house, but a house is not a home.

I was only ten years old then so it took me many years to grasp the wisdom of her words. Today, 48 years on, I now understand what she meant. I have a house. But that house is not my home. And that is because I no longer live in that house since it is in Selangor and I no longer live in Selangor. I am now forced to tumpang in somebody else’s house outside Selangor. But that is not my home. It is someone else’s home. I am just a penumpang, sort of like a pendatang.

I also no longer own a car. I have to take public transport to move around. So I don’t move around anymore since public transport is a hassle, especially in Malaysia that has a primitive public transport system.

Many of my friends tell me they joined Umno for business reasons. My one-time neighbour, a young Malay lawyer, confessed he joined Umno so that he can be assured of getting government contracts. He is a lawyer in Zul Rafique and Co. and an Umno Bukit Bintang youth leader. His purpose for joining Umno is purely economic reasons.

And this goes for many other Malays as well, some of my relatives included. My relatives resent me opposing the government because they are worried that Umno may punish the family for what I am doing. They depend on the government for their livelihood so they do not want me to jeopardise their periuk nasi (rice bowl).

Chinese, too, tell me the same thing. Cari maka mah! They support Barisan Nasional because they need to survive. It’s all about the money. If we oppose the government then we may suffer, economically, they tell me.

Yes, it’s all about the money. Of course, they try to justify their actions by saying they have no choice. They don’t want to support Barisan Nasional. They don’t like supporting Barisan Nasional. But they have no choice but to support Barisan Nasional for the sake of their rice bowl.

To these people they have done no wrong. Okay, it may be immoral for them to support a party they do not believe in. It may be immoral for them to support a party that they actually hate. But they are supporting this party not out of choice. They have no choice in the matter. They are doing it to protect their livelihood.

Prostitutes say the same thing. They open their legs and do blowjobs on their clients not because they are sex-starved or actually enjoy what they are doing. In fact, most prostitutes hate life as a prostitute and hate themselves for doing what they do. But they have no choice. It is not about the pleasure of sex. It is about the necessity of money.

Prostitutes would willingly choose another profession if one was available to them. But they can’t get an honest job for whatever reason, mostly because they lack the education, qualification and skills. So the only option available to them is life as a prostitute.

A house is not a home. That was the title of a movie back in 1960. And the movie was about life as a prostitute. I too live in a house. But that house is not a home. It is someone else’s home. I am just a penumpang. But I am not a prostitute. And it is because I am NOT a prostitute that I now live in a house that is not a home.

But I was offered the opportunity to prostitute myself. One day, some time back, a person by the name of Rusdi Mustaffa who works for Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, called me and said he wanted to meet me. I was then at the Havana Club in the Concord Hotel in Kuala Lumpur enjoying cigars with my friends.

Rusdi arrived way past midnight and we talked. He wanted to know how much I wanted. I did not understand what he meant and told him so. He repeated the question and asked me how much I wanted to stop writing about Najib and Altantuya. Name my price.

The conversation went on for about half an hour, and to cut a long story short, I turned down the offer. The following morning I phoned a certain Chinese Datuk and requested him to make an appointment with Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

At 3.00pm, the Chinese Datuk and me, together with my wife, went to Tun Dr Mahathir’s office in Petronas at the Twin Towers where I related what happened the night before. Tun Dr Mahathir joked that I should have asked for RM20 million. “Then you can give me half.”

I never knew Tun Dr Mahathir as being a joker. I told Tun Dr Mahathir I have never received any money either to write or not write an article or expose in Malaysia Today, “Not even from you,” I added as I pointed to the Tun. He just smiled. I wanted the point to be driven home that I am not a prostitute. I think from that day the Tun and I strengthened our respect for each other. I then kissed Tun’s hand and left his office.

Tun Dr Mahathir phoned Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor and asked him to go and see Najib. Najib was then in Pekan so Tengku Adnan had to fly to Kuantan and drive down to Pekan. The message from Tun was short and sharp. “Don’t try to buy my boy. I know you tried to buy off Raja Petra.”

Within minutes I received a call from Rusdi. He was angry as hell. “I thought I could trust you. Why did you tell Tun about our meeting last night?” I told him that I told Tun so that Najib can be sent the message that I am not for sale, not for any amount of money. And I wanted no less than Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to deliver this message to Najib, his ‘boy’, which he did through Tengku Adnan.

Yes, I am no prostitute. And all those Malays who justify joining Umno for business reasons, and those Chinese and Indians who say they support Barisan Nasional to cari makan, are worse than prostitutes. I despise them. They are shit. And I have no mercy for these people. They are scum of the earth.

Nothing and I mean nothing can justify you prostituting yourself.

Report from Batang Ai: Is this not corruption?

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

1. Is this not corruption?

Reports have been received by PKR operations room in Lubok Antu that Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president James Masing visited Rumah Sandah, Sg. Ara on 21 March 2009 (Sat). During the visit he allegedly promised each of the 946 people a sum of RM500.

By now, some money has been paid. And what was the money meant for is not very clear. But giving money during election time is tantamount to enticing people to vote for the BN candidate, and it is wrong in the eyes of the law.

Any one of the receivers can come up and lodge a report with the Police, Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC), the Election Commission and Malaysians for Free and Fair Election (MAFREL) so that action can be taken.

2. What Bank account?

The residents of Batang Ai were never asked to give their bank account details to the Land and Survey department as claimed by Anwar Ibrahim, de facto leader of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). They were only asked to give copies of their identity cards because the department wants to update its data and records, said Masing.

Masing described Anwar’s accusation as very serious and pointed out that it was the opposition’s tactic to stir emotions in the run-up to the Batang Ai by-election.

When contacted today, Dominique Ng, a PKR State leader said that it was a “day light lie” and described it as a “part of pack of tricks” to fish for votes. Masing should explain to the people why they asked for the people’s bank account numbers.

The Broken Shield received a faxed copy of the letter (pics below) from the Land and Survey department. It is clearly stated in the page two of the letter a column was meant for the Bank Account number of the land owner.

The questions here are: “Why is the Land and Survey Department so suddenly interested to update the data and records of land owners during the by election? Why not 25 years ago? Is there any “prawn underneath the stone”?

3. Masing promises to tar-seal Batang Ai roads

The people of Batang Ai are happy to hear that the Minister of Land Development James Masing is going to tar-seal their roads that have been neglected for more than 25 years. The value of the projects is RM50 million for the tar-sealing of 7km Lemanak Road and the survey and design of a 60km road from Lemanak to Ulu Engkari. These projects, he said, and the RM12 million tar-sealing of 10km ring road in Batang Ai would be implemented by JKR.

Upon completion of these roads, the many longhouses in Ulu Engkari would no longer be isolated; they would be linked to Lubok Antu and other major towns and cities in the state.

While the people of Batang Ai are happy to hear about the promised road projects, the people of Kapit especially from Masing’s own Baleh constituency are sad and have called on Masing to do something about their road linking Kapit with other towns like Kanowit, Sibu, Miri, Kuching etc.

Like Ulu Engkari, Kapit has also been waiting for the last 45 years for the road to be constructed. Should not charity begin at home?

4. No Police permits required in longhouses

Political gatherings which are held in enclosed areas or on private property such as longhouses do not require Police permits, says Sarawak deputy commissioner of police Datuk Hamza Taib. Police, he said, will take action against any party that organizes political gatherings in public places without a permit.

In view of the coming by-election in Batang Ai those found to have flouted the rule could face action under section 27 of the Police Act. Fair enough.

5. Johnny Chuat may not contest

Johnny Chuat, an Iban blogger and producer of Iban magazine called Pegari may not offer himself as an independent candidate, if information received by The Broken Shield is correct. It is understood that he has booked his ticket to go to an African country following his gas and oil company.

This makes the PKR camp happy as BN candidate was not doing well in last election in Engkari and the surrounding areas. Up-todate, eight nomination forms have been taken from the Election Commission.

6. Masing is questioning Jawah’s about turn

Masing today questioned Jawah’s about turn from BN to PKR and said that two years ago in which Jawah the MP for Lubok Antu had expressed his undivided support to BN at a longhouse gathering. But in the space of less than two years Jawah is now with the Opposition and has been picked as its candidate in the by-election.

At that time Jawah also praised the chief minister who had brought tremendous development to Sarawak. Jawah also praised Jabu, a Dayak leader who had done so much for the people especially the Dayaks in the fields of education, culture and economy.

Masing should not have raised this issue of Jawah joining PKR, because Masing himself was in a similar situation, although in a different scenario. In 1991, Masing was launching the “KM project 1992” of PBDS. The project, Ketua Menteri Sarawak ‘92, was the key plan in its campaigning strategy to topple Abdul Taib Mahmud’s government.

If PBDS won, Masing would have been the Chief Minister of Sarawak. Unfortunately the plan failed. And now Masing is praising the Chief Minister and even defended his policies that are the sources of Dayak problems during a TV interview.

On why Jawah was praising Jabu, Jawah’s close friends said that it was to please Jabu because Jabu and the late Unting had “detained” Jawah’s MP projects worth about RM1.6 million. Jawah was given MP projects because he was a BN MP through PBDS in 2004 parliamentary election. We were told after praising Jabu, the funds were released.

7. Mussen’s low key campaigns

Reports from Batang Ai described Malcolm Mussen’s campaigns were up to now in a low key. Just released from the Civil Service, he has still retained the civil servant attitude, the “yesman” type of attitude.

Furthermore, Mussen is being surrounded by some civil servants who act as his “body guards” or PR men who do not allow people to see him. These people who could be Mussen’s supporters are not only angry but have also joined Jawah’s camp. Assuming that Mussen is elected, can he become an effective YB?

From: Broken Shield

End of the road: Shahrir to quit as minister

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Following his defeat in the Umno supreme council elections, Shahrir Abdul Samad said he will resign as the domestic trade and consumer affairs minister.

The Johor-born politician said he will be tendering his resignation at the next cabinet meeting next Wednesday.

Shahrir was among two ministers, three deputy ministers and four menteris besar who were shown the exit from the supreme council in yesterday’s polls.

Shahrir explained to reporters this morning that he has set his heart to quit from his minister’s post after failing to retain his Umno supreme council seat yesterday.

Speaking at a press conference at the Umno general assembly at Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC), Shahrir said his arrived at this decision because he did not receive the endorsement from Umno delegates.

“As a minister, the most important principle is to get moral support from the delegates,” said Shahrir, who appeared calm throughout the press conference.

“There are a lot of inflation and price issues under this ministry, but chances should be given to someone else (who is willing to help the people) rather than me.

“This is a golden opportunity for (someone else) to handle the people’s issues. If I don’t withdraw myself, other people would not get the chance.

“One year is enough for me as a minister. They should find someone who is younger and more energetic.

“The ministerial post does not belong to me, it belongs to the government. If it (the withdrawal) is to the benefit of the people, why not,” he said.

My decision is final

Shahrir also stressed that he would not accept an appointment to the supreme council if an offer was made by the new party president Najib Abdul Razak.

The party’s constitution allows the president to appoint 12 supreme council members in addition to the 25 who were elected by the delegates.

“I am not sad. A decision has been made. For me, a post in the party is much important than a post in the cabinet… that is why I offered myself to be one of the candidates in the first place,” said Shahrir.

Asked whether he would reconsider his decision, Shahrir said:

“My decision is usually final… I do not want to be re-appointed. They should always try to get someone new no matter how good you are”.

“Moreover, it would have been much easier to fulfil my task as a minister if there was moral strength for me within the party.

“(When) I don’t receive any support, how could I face the people and the opposition (members) in handling the (ministerial) task?

“As a minister, I have to come to Parliament and answer questions, but how can I answer the questions if I am not even endorsed by the party,” he asked.

The maverick politician also said that since the country’s inflation state was not as bad as before, he was comfortable in letting go his cabinet post.

“Besides, this is not the first time I’m in the cabinet… I’m already near 60 and I have said before that I would offer myself to resign.”

One other minister who lost

Nevertheless Shahrir asserted that he would stay as the Johor Baru member of parliament.

Shahrir’s resignation from the cabinet next Wednesday would also coincide with the final cabinet meeting to be chaired by the outgoing premier Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

The other minister who lost to be retained to the supreme council was Tourism Minister Azalina Othman Said (photo), who is currently being investigated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

It is uncertain if she will also similarly resign from her cabinet post. She was not available to comment when contacted.

However her aide, when contacted, said that the embattle minister would be making an announcement next week. Mkini

Khir Toyo faces assembly ban over Balkis case

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

SHAH ALAM, March 27 – Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo could be banned from the Selangor assembly while his wife faces possible police action for not attending the Balkis inquiry.

State speaker Teng Chang Khim said both are in contempt of the State Assembly when they failed to attend the Select Committee for Competence, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) inquiry into Balkis, a charity set up by the former Barisan Nasional state government for their wives.

“It’s the Legislative Assembly which established Selcat and action can be taken against Dr Khir, who is a member of the Assembly, while his wife is liable for criminal action under Section 3 of the Contempt of the House Enactment 2008,” Teng said today.

He said Selcat has recommended that Dr Khir be sent to the Selangor Assembly’s. Privilege Committee while a police report will be lodged against his wife Datin Zahrah Kechik for failing to attend the inquiry.

Teng disclosed that any member of Selcat can refer the former Selangor Menteri Besar to the Privilege Committee while the Selcat secretary will lodge the police report against Zahrah.

“It will then be the responsibility of the police to conduct investigations and refer the report to the Attorney General (AG) Chambers to determine if she should be charged, in court.”

Teng said by convention, Dr Khir can be suspended, without pay from the Assembly.

On Monday, solicitors representing Dr Khir and Zahrah, sent letters informing the committee they would not be attending the public inquiry because Selcat did not have “certification” from the AG.

Teng said Dr Khir was ignorant of the state Constitution and Standing Orders which is the basis of the establishment of the Selcat.

“Selcat does not need certification because the State Assembly is a legislature and does not come under the supervision of the AG.”

Teng added no Barisan Nasional assemblyman, including Dr Khir had apposed the motion to establish Selcat when it was tabled in the state assembly last year.

“In fact, two Barisan Nasional members in Selcat had taken part in meetings and were in attendance on the first day of the public inquiry.”

In the inquiry today, Selangor Registrar of Society (ROS) deputy registrar Yunos Jamil admitted Balkis accounts were not audited by authorised auditors, when he supported an application to dissolve the charity.

Upon checking the accounts of the charity,which was submitted with the application to dissolve the Balkis, Yunos told the Selcat the accounts, were not signed by any auditor.

However in his earlier testimony, Yunos had said audited accounts were necessary before any society could be dissolved and he was satisfied that Balkis had fulfilled all requirements.

Yunos was at a loss to explained the discrepancy, which he described as an oversight, and argued that nothing could be done because the decision to dissolve Balkis was made by a minister, in Putrajaya.

But Teng pointed out that it was an offence for any one to submit fraudulent reports to the ROS under the Societies Act.

However, Yunos maintained his department was powerless to act.

Yunos also testified that Balkis had almost RM10 million in cash when it was dissolved but did not have a list of its other assets.

He is due to return before the Selcat on Monday. MI

Bukit Gantang 70 houses with 15 or more

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Malvu

SPR appears to have discarded or hidden information about voters’s street names. In Bukit Gantang, 70 “big houses” have 15 or more voters, registered with specific house numbers but many without street names. Two clusters stand out. There are 31 such houses in Changkat Jering/Larut Tin/Taman Sungai Mas. Another 20 such houses are located in Kuala Sapetang/Kamunting Station/Taman Mewah. We make some suggestions about how observers can document possible SPR negligence with camera phones.

The last blog entry was about addresses WITHOUT house numbers, but with many voters (over 200); such non-specific addresses tend to have very large number of voters.

This blog entry is about localities WITH house number but also many voters (over 15 voters in one house). These 70 “big houses” contain two clusters of houses in modern-sounding housing estates, which we will highlight in Tables B and C. It appears their street names (eg, Jalan 11) are missing, even though they look like modern housing estates (not old kampong) from their names and satellite maps.


Table A gives an overview that:

  • In Bukit Gantang, 70 houses, with specific house numbers, appear to have 15 or more voters “living” in these “big” houses.
  • 7 of these are registered with 30 or more voters.
  • A possible explanation: SPR may not have properly registered these voters with their “Jalan” or “Lorong” name and numbers.
  • Separately, SPR has not been consistent with the formats of house numbering. We have had to consolidate and clean up house number variations such as: A39, A 39, A-39, and NO A39 in 059/13/06/001 or Bukit Gantang / Kuala Sapetang / Kampong Menteri /Kampong Mentri Kuala Sapetang.

Table A: P059 Bukit Gantang 200902 By-Election List of voters in large unique addresses with 15 or more voters, WITH a house number (NoRumah)
E.g., 34 voters live in 059/14/06/005 WITH house number 7

Voter count parl/DUN/DM/lokaliti P059 Bukit Gantang NamaDUN NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah Cleaned
34 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 7
32 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 26
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 17
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 6
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 10
30 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 14
30 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 18
29 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 2
29 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 3
29 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 5
28 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 2
28 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 15
27 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 9
27 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 12
27 059/14/07/003 Changkat Jering Ayer Kuning Kampong Ayer Kuning P Aor 50
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 21
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 3
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 19
25 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 11
25 059/14/03/001 Changkat Jering Simpang Baru Simpang New Village 120
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 33
24 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 4
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 42
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 1
24 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 10
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 26
23 059/14/07/003 Changkat Jering Ayer Kuning Kampong Ayer Kuning P Aor 64
23 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 8
23 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 5
22 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 28
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 13
21 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 16
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 9
21 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 32
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 12
20 059/14/03/001 Changkat Jering Simpang Baru Simpang New Village 110
20 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 22
20 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 28
20 059/13/05/009 Kuala Sapetang Kuala Sapetang Riverside Kuala Sapetang 91
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 1
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 6
19 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 23
19 059/14/01/025 Changkat Jering Pengkalan Aor Kampong Benggali 36
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 8
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 4
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 20
18 059/13/05/003 Kuala Sapetang Kuala Sapetang Seberang Kuala Sapetang 109
18 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 15
18 059/14/07/003 Changkat Jering Ayer Kuning Kampong Ayer Kuning P Aor 143A
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 24
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 21
17 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 30
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 33
17 059/14/03/001 Changkat Jering Simpang Baru Simpang New Village 164
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 27
16 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 25
16 059/13/05/009 Kuala Sapetang Kuala Sapetang Riverside Kuala Sapetang 157
16 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 11
16 059/15/11/003 Trong Sungai Tinggi Kampong Sungai Tinggi 127
16 059/13/03/005 Kuala Sapetang Simpang Halt Taman Kota Jaya 674
16 059/14/03/001 Changkat Jering Simpang Baru Simpang New Village 126
15 059/13/01/008 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Kg Rahmat LOT15
15 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 20
15 059/14/08/024 Changkat Jering Changkat Jering Changkat Jering L C Area 11
15 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 31
15 059/13/09/012 Kuala Sapetang Jalan Mangala Telok Kertang Matang 19
15 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 31
15 059/14/05/001 Changkat Jering Kawasan J.K.R Batu 2 1/2 Simpang Road 511
15 059/13/03/003 Kuala Sapetang Simpang Halt Simpang Halt 57
15 059/13/06/001 Kuala Sapetang Kampong Menteri Kampong Mentri Kuala Sapetang A39

Click this or “Read More …” at the bottom to view this long table

Cluster 1: Taman Sungai Mas.

Table B shows that:

  • A cluster of 31 houses with specific house numbers (NoRumah) are registered with 15 or voters living in them!
  • They are all located at locality code (Kodlokaliti) 059/14/06/005, ie, P059 Bukit Gantang’s Changkat Jering (N14), in Larut Tin DM, and in Taman Sungai Mas.
  • For example:
    • 24 voters are registered at house number 1, at Changkat Jering/Larut Tin/Taman Sungai Mas
    • 29 voters are registered at house number 2, at Changkat Jering/Larut Tin/Taman Sungai Mas
    • 26 voters are registered at house number 3, at Changkat Jering/Larut Tin/Taman Sungai Mas
    • etc
  • Our guesses:
    • This address looks like a modern housing estate, hence should have had their house numbers registered.
    • Their “Lorong” or “Jalan” names and numbers appear to be missing.
    • When we search Google for “perak ‘taman sungai mas’ lorong or jalan” we readily found specific examples of Lorong or Jalan names and numbers (eg, Jalan 11) for this housing estate.
  • The housing estate appears to be located here in WikiMapia.org map.
    • They don’t look like long houses,
    • They don’t look like traditional kampong address,
    • They don’t look like rural residents who have to go to post office to pick up mail,
    • They don’t look like high-rise apartments (which in any case are new buildings that should have been registered with the proper “block” numbers).
  • Our question: Had SPR been negligent and not properly registering and publishing these voter’s “Lorong/Jalan” names and numbers?
  • If SPR had strictly followed a voters’ ICs (MyKad) because the ICs contain incomplete address, how can the National Registration Department be so careless about the full address?

Table B: P059 Bukit Gantang 200902 By-Election
Large addresses (with house numbers) in 059/14/06/005 or Changkat Jering / Larut Tin / Taman Sungai Mas

Voter
count
parl/DUN/DM/lokaliti P059 Bukit Gantang
NamaDUN
NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah
Cleaned
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 1
29 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 2
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 3
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 4
29 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 5
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 6
34 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 7
23 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 8
27 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 9
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 10
25 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 11
27 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 12
30 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 14
28 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 15
21 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 16
31 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 17
30 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 18
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 19
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 20
26 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 21
20 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 22
19 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 23
18 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 24
16 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 25
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 26
20 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 28
17 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 30
15 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 31
21 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 32
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 33
24 059/14/06/005 Changkat Jering Larut Tin Taman Sungai Mas 42

How to check possible SPR negligence in registering voter house number?

  • Let’s check voter IC’s addresses against SPR’s voter roll info for Taman Sungai Mas (Table B) and Taman Mewah (Table C)!
  • Specific individual voter details as published by SPR are available for field checking at these 2 places.
  • If we can document that these voters’ ICs contain the house number BUT SPR’s data do not, there would be a major case to be made and presented to the MPs and media to make SPR improve the voter’s roll, even without asking for laws to be changed.
  • To make such a case if any, observers should get photocopy/ phone-photo of voters who
    • are registered WITHOUT NoRumah or locality details,
    • BUT do have such details in the ICs.
  • Camera phone would be an advantage, because of these reasons:
    • they are handy for taking pictures; they can store a few dozen, and pictures can be sent directly or downloaded to PC, email, and blog sites (with some details blurred out to protect privacy).
    • voters may be more comfortable with camera phone, because not looking like photocopy, camera pictures can be made to avoid forgery cases. Photo taker can make sure of this with someone holding the MyKad with a thumb, and include the thumb/finger inside the photo.
  • If observer obtains photocopy of IC, the observers should cross-out the copy with double lines, then write the purpose in the blank space in the center. An experienced Streamyx distributor had suggested that IC copies be crossed out in this way in service applications, such as for Streamyx services. We should then write in the center of the IC copy, in the blank space, eg, “For Streamyx only.” This is to enssure that the IC photocopy would be more difficult to be misused.

Cluster 2: Taman Mewah.

The story in Table C is similar to Table B:

  • A cluster of 20 houses with specific house numbers (NoRumah) are registered with 15 or voters living in them!
  • They are all located at locality code (Kodlokaliti) 059/13/01/011, ie, P059 Bukit Gantang’s Kuala Sapetang (N13), in Kamunting Station DM, and in Taman Mewah.
  • For example:
    • 19 voters are registered at house number 1, at Kuala Sapetang/Kamunting Station/Taman Mewah
    • 28 voters are registered at house number 2, at Kuala Sapetang/Kamunting Station/Taman Mewah
    • 29 voters are registered at house number 3, at Kuala Sapetang/Kamunting Station/Taman Mewah
  • Their “Lorong” or “Jalan” names and numbers appear to be missing.
  • When we google for “perak ‘taman mewah’ lorong or jalan” we readily found specific examples of “Lorong/Jalan” names and numbers (eg, Lorong Mewah 19) for addresses in this locality.

Table C: P059 Bukit Gantang 200902 By-Election
Large addresses (with house numbers) in 059/13/01/011 or Kuala Sapetang / Kamunting Station / Taman Mewah

Voter
count
parl/DUN/DM/lokaliti P059 Bukit Gantang
NamaDUN
NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah
Cleaned
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 1
28 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 2
29 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 3
24 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 4
23 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 5
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 6
19 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 8
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 9
24 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 10
16 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 11
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 12
21 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 13
18 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 15
15 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 20
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 21
32 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 26
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 27
22 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 28
15 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 31
17 059/13/01/011 Kuala Sapetang Kamunting Station Taman Mewah 33

Vague addresses: 20 without house number in Bkt Selambau

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Malvu

20% voters in Bukit Selambau are registered WITHOUT house numbers. The largest such address with blank house numbers has 339 voters. One DM has 90% voters WITHOUT house number.

SPR voter roll data are highly unspecific, making it difficult to verify voter existence, which leaves an opening for electoral frauds and the introduction of phantom voters:

  1. This article will show that many voters are registered by SPR without recording their specific address house numbers (the situation even worse in Batang Air, to be discussed in a later article),
  2. The next blog will show that, even when house numbers are registered, a large number of voters are registered without their specific street names (eg, Jalan 11) even in a modern housing estates, with the SPR recording only the name of the general housing area (eg, Taman Mewah).

This issue is similar to the “blank house number” issue discussed in:

Table A shows that

  • 20.4% of 35,140 voters, or 7,163, in Bukit Selambau (N25 of Kedah, under P014 Merbok) are registered on SPR voters roll without house number (NoRumah).

Table A: P014 Merbok N25 Bukit Selambau 200902 By-Election
Percentage of voters with blank NoRumah by DUN, excluding postal voters

parl/DUN/DM NamaDUN Count of
voters without
house number
Count of voters Percent
014/25/15 Bukit Selambau 7,163 35,125 20.4%
Postal voters 15
All voters 35,140

Table B shows that, in Bukit Selambau,

  • 12 localities or addresses have over 200 voters registered without house number (blank NoRumah data field).
  • 6 of them have over 300 voters.
  • An example is the 339 voters live in 014/25/03/003 but without house number, ie, Merbok/Bukit Selambau/Bukit Lembu/Ladang Sungai Getah/[blank house number]
  • We have “cleaned up” the house number (NoRumah) data field, because SPR has been inconsistent with house number format, such as using “” blanks, “Null”, “Nil”, “Tiada”, or “-” to represent the same thing.

Table B: P014 Merbok N25 Bukit Selambau 200902 By-Election
List of voters in large unique addresses with BLANK HOUSE NUMBER (NoRumah), with 200 or more voters in one unique address without NoRumah

Voter count parl/DUN /DM /lokaliti N25 Bukit Selambau NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah Cleaned
339 014/25/03/003 Bukit Lembu Ladang Sungai Getah
317 014/25/03/004 Bukit Lembu Ladang Sungkap Para
315 014/25/01/002 Kuala Sin Kampong Perak
312 014/25/03/001 Bukit Lembu Ladang Bukit Lembu Kongsi Enam
307 014/25/01/001 Kuala Sin Kg Kuala Sin
302 014/25/02/003 Kampung Sungkap Kampong Sungkap
247 014/25/15/002 Petani Para Ldg Patani Para Sg Patani
230 014/25/04/002 Taman Bandar Baru Ladang Sg Tok Pawang Div 2
218 014/25/18/001 Kampung Pokok Machang Kg Pokok Machang
216 014/25/16/002 Bukit Rusa Selambau Div14 U P Est Sg Patani
215 014/25/20/002 Titi Panjang Kg Pantai Chichar
212 014/25/16/001 Bukit Rusa Bukit Rusa Estate

Table C shows that, in N25 Bukit Selambau of Kedah (under P014 Merbok):

  • 5 out of 22 DMs (Daerah Mengundi, voting district) have more than 80% of voters registered WITHOUT house numbers (NoRumah),
  • The highest rate is at 014/25/15 or Merbok/Bukit Selambau/Petani Para, with over 90% blank house numbers.
  • 8/22 DMs have over half of voters registered without house numbers.
  • In the next blog entry, we will see that even those DMs with low rate of blank house number are problematic!
  • We will see that, for example, Taman Bandar Baru (014/25/04, more than 1/2) and Taman Peruda (014/25/11, more than 1/3 voters) contain a large number of voters registered with house number, but without specific street names (eg Jalan 1)!
  • So SPR has published voter roll that despite looking good in table C below, is making voters difficult to trace and verify (see next blog entry).

Table C: P014 Merbok N25 Bukit Selambau 200902 By-Election
Percentage of voters with blank NoRumah by DM
Arranged by PERCENTAGES

parl/DUN /DM NamaDUN N25 Bukit Selambau
NamaDM
Count of voters
without house number
Count of
voters
Percent
014/25/15 Bukit Selambau Petani Para 324 359 90.3%
014/25/18 Bukit Selambau Kampung Pokok Machang 599 696 86.1%
014/25/19 Bukit Selambau Batu Belachan 657 785 83.7%
014/25/02 Bukit Selambau Kampung Sungkap 496 600 82.7%
014/25/03 Bukit Selambau Bukit Lembu 993 1,223 81.2%
014/25/01 Bukit Selambau Kuala Sin 646 831 77.7%
014/25/20 Bukit Selambau Titi Panjang 796 1,058 75.2%
014/25/16 Bukit Selambau Bukit Rusa 451 667 67.6%
014/25/17 Bukit Selambau Pekan Bukit Selambau 625 1,986 31.5%
014/25/14 Bukit Selambau United Petani 196 973 20.1%
014/25/05 Bukit Selambau Sungai Lalang 355 1,986 17.9%
014/25/07 Bukit Selambau Bandar Laguna Merbok 117 971 12.0%
014/25/10 Bukit Selambau Jalan Badlishah 94 796 11.8%
014/25/06 Bukit Selambau Taman Desa Aman 206 2,514 8.2%
014/25/04 Bukit Selambau Taman Bandar Baru 284 4,179 6.8%
014/25/09 Bukit Selambau Air Menideh 90 1,695 5.3%
014/25/21 Bukit Selambau Ambangan Height 28 647 4.3%
014/25/11 Bukit Selambau Taman Peruda 54 1,936 2.8%
014/25/08 Bukit Selambau Tasek Apong 27 1,363 2.0%
014/25/13 Bukit Selambau Taman Ria Jaya 87 5,122 1.7%
014/25/12 Bukit Selambau Taman Ria Utara 20 2,244 0.9%
014/25/22 Bukit Selambau Taman Ria Selatan 18 2,494 0.7%
Total Excluding postal 7,163 35,125 20.4%

No street names despite modern estate

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Malvu

Another problem with SPR data is the many voters registered without street names in modern housing areas, despite having a house number. More than 2/3 of voters in Taman Bandar Baru (the “new town garden”), eg, are registered with house number, but without street address.

While the previous blog entry highlighted a large number of voters registered without house number, this article questions those registered even with house numbers but without the street name. Such vague registration opens the ground for possible electoral frauds and phantom voters.

Why should SPR repeat the address information of Taman Peruda/Taman Peruda (DM/lokaliti), or Taman Bandar Baru/Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang, but miss out the street name (such as Lorong 1 or Jalan 1)?

This issue is similar to the “big houses” issue discussed in

Table A shows that in Bukit Selambau (N25 under P014) in Kedah:

  • 94 addresses of “big houses” are each registered with 15 or more voters ,
  • these are addresses with specific house number,
  • an example is that 85 voters live in 014/25/04/007 (Merbok/Bukit Selambau/Taman Bandar Baru/Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang ), registered WITH the house number 7
  • What’s going on? Why such a “big house?”
  • Why does SPR repeat the information “Taman Bandar Baru” twice but not give information on what “Jalan” or “Lorong”?
  • Table B will group them into mainly 2 large clusters of such voters.

Table A: P014 Merbok N25 Bukit Selambau 200902 By-Election
List of NON-BLANK large unique addresses with 15 or more voters, WITH a house number (NoRumah)

Voter count parl/DUN/DM/lokaliti N25 Bukit Selambau NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah Cleaned
85 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 7
84 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 19
83 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 11
82 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 3
74 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 9
73 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 6
73 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 12
72 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 14
71 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 2
71 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 16
70 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 1
69 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 29
66 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 4
65 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 20
62 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 17
58 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 18
58 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 24
57 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 15
57 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 31
56 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 8
56 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 11A
55 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 5
54 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 10
53 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 25
49 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 27
48 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 22
46 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 37
45 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 23
45 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 30
44 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 33
42 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 35
42 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 43
40 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 28
39 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 21
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 26
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 40
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 42
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 49
37 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 7
36 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 32
35 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 34
35 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 3
34 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 39
34 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 51
32 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 45
30 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 11
30 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 14
29 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 36
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 2
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 10
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 17
28 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 41
28 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 48
28 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 1
28 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 16
27 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 5
26 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 15
26 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 21
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 4
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 8
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 13
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 38
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 51
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 52
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 62
24 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 6
24 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 22
23 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 50
23 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 9
23 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 55
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 44
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 54
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 61
22 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 12
21 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 64
21 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 26
21 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 28
20 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 55
20 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 59
20 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 19
19 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 47
19 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 47
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 27
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 33
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 45
17 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 60
17 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 68
17 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 20
17 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 49
16 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 56
16 014/25/17/004 Pekan Bukit Selambau Pekan Bukit Selambau 1
15 014/25/09/003 Air Menideh Jalan Nuri 4
15 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 24
15 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 31


Click this or “Read More …” at the bottom to view this long table

Table B contains the same data as Table A, but re-grouped by Kodlokaliti, so that similar addresses are clustered together.

Table B shows that:

  • There are 2 clusters of houses where SPR recorded specific “house numbers” but failed to record or publish the “street name and numbers,” such as “Jalan 1″ or “Lorong 1″.

Cluster 1: Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang

  • This makes it difficult to verify the existence of these voters, and easy to commit election fraud with phantom voters.
  • The voters in these 60 houses total 2,729 persons, and represents 65% of the 4,179 voters within this DM (014/25/04 or Merbok/Bukit Selambau/Taman Bandar Baru)
  • There must be more cases below 15 voters in the same addresses, and the percentage of those who appear to live in “big houses” must be higher than 65%.
  • These are not old “kampong” or village addresses, or apartments,
  • They appear to be modern housing areas, judging from the name (Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang) and map of the neighbourhood on WikiMapia.org (see right).
  • When we Google for “kedah ‘taman bandar baru’ lorong or jalan” we readily found specific examples of Lorong or Jalan names and numbers (eg, Lorong Jati) for this housing estate.

Our questions:

  • Had SPR been negligent and not properly registering and publishing these voter’s “Lorong/Jalan” names and numbers?
  • Doesn’t this make it difficult for election observers, even SPR itself, to verify the existence of these voters?
  • Doesn’t this make it easy for someone to commit election fraud and plant phantom voters?
  • If SPR had strictly followed a voters’ ICs (MyKad) because the ICs contain incomplete address, how can the National Registration Department be so careless about the full address?

Cluster 2: Taman Peruda

  • Another cluster is 014/25/11/002 or Merbok/Bukit Selambau/Taman Peruda/Taman Peruda
  • There are 33 houses here that appear to house 15 or more voters each.
  • When we Google for “kedah ‘taman peruda’ lorong or jalan” we readily found specific examples of Lorong or Jalan names and numbers (eg, Lorong 2) for this housing estate.

Table B: P014 Merbok N25 Bukit Selambau 200902 By-Election
List of NON-BLANK large unique addresses with 15 or more voters, WITH a house number (NoRumah)
GROUPED BY KODLOKALITI AND HOUSE NUMBER

Voter count parl/DUN/DM/lokaliti N25 Bukit Selambau NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah Cleaned
70 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 1
71 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 2
82 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 3
66 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 4
55 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 5
73 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 6
85 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 7
56 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 8
74 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 9
54 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 10
83 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 11
73 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 12
72 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 14
57 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 15
71 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 16
62 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 17
58 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 18
84 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 19
65 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 20
39 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 21
48 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 22
45 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 23
58 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 24
53 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 25
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 26
49 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 27
40 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 28
69 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 29
45 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 30
57 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 31
36 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 32
44 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 33
35 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 34
42 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 35
29 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 36
46 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 37
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 38
34 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 39
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 40
28 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 41
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 42
42 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 43
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 44
32 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 45
19 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 47
28 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 48
37 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 49
23 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 50
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 51
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 52
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 54
20 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 55
16 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 56
20 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 59
17 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 60
22 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 61
24 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 62
21 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 64
17 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 68
56 014/25/04/007 Taman Bandar Baru Taman Bandar Baru Sg Lalang 11A
15 014/25/09/003 Air Menideh Jalan Nuri 4
28 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 1
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 2
35 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 3
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 4
27 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 5
24 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 6
37 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 7
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 8
23 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 9
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 10
30 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 11
22 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 12
25 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 13
30 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 14
26 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 15
28 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 16
29 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 17
20 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 19
17 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 20
26 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 21
24 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 22
15 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 24
21 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 26
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 27
21 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 28
15 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 31
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 33
18 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 45
19 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 47
17 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 49
34 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 51
23 014/25/11/002 Taman Peruda Taman Peruda 55
16 014/25/17/004 Pekan Bukit Selambau Pekan Bukit Selambau 1

What can be done?

Use our phone camera to take photo of ICs with specific street name in these 2 clusters, to prove that SPR has not registered voters properly, or not publishing the information for voter verification.

Batang Air – 96% voters without house number, 350-in-one address

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Malvu

Over 96% of voters in Batang Air do not have house numbers. As a result, up to 350 voters are lumped under one general locality that will be very difficult to verify. Either SPR is negligent, NRIC is negligent, or the Malaysian government development has failed to help Batang Air voters get basic and specific mailing addresses after 46 years.

None of these reasons look good. Either, SPR, NRIC, or the government has to change.

Overall, 1/3 of Malaysian voters are registered without house number (NoRumah). See our blog entry NoRumah? No Rumah? More than 1/3 voters homeless?

If you think that is bad, Table A shows that:

  • Batang Air is close to the extreme case in percentage of voters WITHOUT house number.
  • 96.3% of Batang Air (N29) of Lubok Antu (P203) are registered by SPR without a house number.
  • An example: 350 voters live in 203/29/02/002 without house number, ie, Lubok Antu /Batang Air/Lubok Antu/Lubok Antu/[blank house number]
  • There are 5 DMs with 100% rate of voters without house number.
  • The only one below the 90% rate is DM Lubok Antu, with 87% of voters without house numbers.
  • Even if Batang Air residents are mostly living in long houses, aren’t there more specific door numbers or room/hall/section numbers, at least for a few percentages of the voters?

Table A: P203N29 DUN Batang Air Electoral Roll 200902
Percentage of voters with blank NoRumah by DM, excluding postal voters
Arranged by PERCENTAGES

parl/DUN/DM NamaDUN NamaDM Count of voters with BLANK NoRumah Count of all Voters Percent
203/29/09 Batang Air Kumpang 155 155 100.0%
203/29/20 Batang Air Patoh 133 133 100.0%
203/29/05 Batang Air Engkari 98 98 100.0%
203/29/21 Batang Air Bilararap 198 198 100.0%
203/29/19 Batang Air Kachong 240 240 100.0%
203/29/10 Batang Air Klampu 384 385 99.7%
203/29/06 Batang Air Delok 195 196 99.5%
203/29/23 Batang Air Gugu 290 292 99.3%
203/29/24 Batang Air Nenyang 74 75 98.7%
203/29/03 Batang Air Sekarok 349 356 98.0%
203/29/18 Batang Air Ensawang 540 551 98.0%
203/29/11 Batang Air Sayat 322 329 97.9%
203/29/08 Batang Air Empit 422 432 97.7%
203/29/04 Batang Air Kesit 656 673 97.5%
203/29/01 Batang Air Sebangki 466 479 97.3%
203/29/12 Batang Air Kutai 608 627 97.0%
203/29/22 Batang Air Sepaya 284 293 96.9%
203/29/14 Batang Air Jela 431 449 96.0%
203/29/16 Batang Air Bertik 187 196 95.4%
203/29/15 Batang Air Sempang 116 123 94.3%
203/29/13 Batang Air Mepi 408 437 93.4%
203/29/17 Batang Air Krangan Mong 138 148 93.2%
203/29/07 Batang Air Kaong 347 382 90.8%
203/29/02 Batang Air Lubok Antu 625 716 87.3%
Overall 7,666 7,963 96.3%

What can by-election observers do?

Use phone cameras to take photo of any voter ICs with specific house number but whose house numbers do not appear in the voter roll. This would prove that SPR has not registered voters properly, or not publishing the information for voter verification.

Go here for more details about this suggestion.

In the above link, we suggest how field observers can verify whether these voters really do or do not have house numbers in the IC/MyKad. If they don’t, then the pressure should shift to NRIC Department to include these crucial information in ICs.

Table B shows that:

  • SPR’s voter registration is so unspecific, omitting any house/door number, that 350 voters are lumped into an address without house number (NoRumah).
  • 67 localities without house number contain more than 50 voters each.

Table B: P203N29 DUN Batang Air Electoral Roll 200902
List of 50 or more voters in the “same house” – NON-POSTAL VOTERS
Voters grouped by unique addresses (Kodlokaliti + NoRumah)
For TM: SMK=Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan; SK=Sekolah Kebangsaan; Tdk=Tadika; Dwn=Dewan; Pjb=Pejabat; Rmh=Rumah. You can expand the TM column for full view.

voters in addr parl/DUN/DM/ lokaliti NamaDM NamaLokaliti NoRumah Cleaned TM
350 203/29/02/002 Lubok Antu Lubok Antu SMK Lubok Antu
194 203/29/01/001 Sebangki Sebangki Panjai SK Sebangki
184 203/29/03/001 Sekarok Sekarok SK Sekarok
178 203/29/12/001 Kutai Kg. Kutai SK Lubok Antu
166 203/29/14/004 Jela Ng Jela Sps Tdk Kemas Nanga Jela
155 203/29/12/005 Kutai Panjai Ruai SK Lubok Antu
141 203/29/08/003 Empit Ng San SK Melaban Empit
129 203/29/07/001 Kaong Kaong Ulu Sps Tdk Kemas Kaong Ulu
128 203/29/04/002 Kesit Lbk Subong SK Nanga Kesit
123 203/29/04/006 Kesit Sarubah SK Nanga Kesit
123 203/29/12/003 Kutai Lalang SK Lubok Antu
115 203/29/07/003 Kaong Pudai Sps Tdk Kemas Kaong Ulu
114 203/29/03/002 Sekarok Bui Panjai SK Sekarok
110 203/29/18/003 Ensawang Wong Panjai Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
109 203/29/02/003 Lubok Antu Nyemungan SMK Lubok Antu
109 203/29/12/002 Kutai Batu Bebini SK Lubok Antu
106 203/29/13/003 Mepi Ng Pan Sps SK Batang Ai
104 203/29/13/004 Mepi Ng Mepi Sps SK Batang Ai
103 203/29/04/001 Kesit Rh. Ran Ng. Kesit SK Nanga Kesit
103 203/29/07/002 Kaong Sg Ara Sps Tdk Kemas Kaong Ulu
103 203/29/18/006 Ensawang Wong Pandak Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
102 203/29/17/002 Krangan Mong Kerangan Mong Sps Tdk Kemas Krangan Mong
99 203/29/22/001 Sepaya Raraka Engkari SK Nanga Tibu
97 203/29/08/002 Empit Bulo SK Melaban Empit
96 203/29/11/001 Sayat Ng Kumpang SK Nanga Kumpang
95 203/29/22/003 Sepaya Ng Setamang SK Nanga Tibu
94 203/29/08/001 Empit Empit SK Melaban Empit
94 203/29/13/001 Mepi Kaong Ili Sps SK Batang Ai
91 203/29/10/001 Klampu Danau Rmh Renggie Bukong
90 203/29/08/004 Empit Changkol SK Melaban Empit
90 203/29/22/002 Sepaya Sepaya Engkari SK Nanga Tibu
89 203/29/10/005 Klampu Kelampu Rmh Renggie Bukong
88 203/29/10/004 Klampu Bt Tungku Rmh Renggie Bukong
88 203/29/14/005 Jela Ng Telaus Sps Tdk Kemas Nanga Jela
88 203/29/18/001 Ensawang Ensawang Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
88 203/29/18/002 Ensawang Rakut Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
87 203/29/02/001 Lubok Antu Govt Residential SMK Lubok Antu
85 203/29/09/001 Kumpang Kumpang Langgir SK Nanga Aup
77 203/29/04/014 Kesit Ng Ngemah SK Nanga Kesit
77 203/29/06/004 Delok Ng Sumpa Delok SK Nanga Delok Lubok Antu
77 203/29/21/003 Bilararap Bilararap SK Ulu Lemanak Nanga Uyau
75 203/29/11/002 Sayat Sayat SK Nanga Kumpang
74 203/29/01/005+B383 Sebangki Tebusan Bara SK Sebangki
74 203/29/23/003 Gugu Ng Mengkak Rmh Intang Mengiling
72 203/29/11/003 Sayat Sermat SK Nanga Kumpang
70 203/29/09/002 Kumpang Kumpang Paoh SK Nanga Aup
70 203/29/14/001 Jela Ng Tutong Sps Tdk Kemas Nanga Jela
70 203/29/14/003 Jela Ng Musing Sps Tdk Kemas Nanga Jela
66 203/29/16/001 Bertik Ng Bengap Sps Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Sps Batang Ai
65 203/29/19/004 Kachong Ng Puloh Lemanak SK Nanga Menyebat
65 203/29/20/004 Patoh Ng Bawi Patoh Pjb Pertanian Nanga Patoh
64 203/29/10/003 Klampu Bukong Rmh Renggie Bukong
63 203/29/01/002 Sebangki Bintong SK Sebangki
63 203/29/13/005 Mepi Ng Mepi Pasir Sps SK Batang Ai
62 203/29/01/006 Sebangki Nyato Kesit Lemanak SK Sebangki
62 203/29/16/002 Bertik Ng Bertik Sps Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Sps Batang Ai
62 203/29/23/002 Gugu Mengiling Rmh Intang Mengiling
61 203/29/23/005 Gugu Ng Ukom Rmh Intang Mengiling
60 203/29/01/003 Sebangki Sebangki Ulu SK Sebangki
60 203/29/18/005 Ensawang Tabau Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
59 203/29/16/003 Bertik Ng Jengin Sps Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Sps Batang Ai
58 203/29/18/007 Ensawang Panggang Dwn Serbaguna Salcra Skim Batu Kaya
52 203/29/10/002 Klampu Kandis Btg Ai Rmh Renggie Bukong
51 203/29/03/003 Sekarok Bui Ran SK Sekarok
51 203/29/05/001 Engkari Ng Talong SK Ulu Engkari
50 203/29/15/001 Sempang Tapang Pungga Sps Tdk Kemas Sempang
50 203/29/21/004 Bilararap Ng Uyau SK Ulu Lemanak Nanga Uyau

Batang Ai: Art of ‘randau ruai’ key in campaign

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

A speaker’s ability to weave historical folklore, especially of Iban warriors, into a rhetorical style that subtly plays on emotions, renders political ideas in simple terms, employs references to Iban culture and lifestyle, while leavening the whole with humour makes one a skilled exponent of ‘randau ruai’.

MCPX

Batang Ai is a majority Iban constituency – up to 93% of the 8,129 voters – so the mastery of art of ‘randau ruai’, which translates as ‘verandah conversation’, will count in the battle between the contestants, likely to be Malcolm Mussen of Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) and Jawah Gerang of PKR.

‘Ruai’ refers to the verandah of the longhouses in which the Iban live, an open area, often lit by fluorescent lamps, where the folk spread their mats to sit and while away the night in conversation after dinner.

“You have to be good at ‘randau ruai’, especially if the contest between the candidates is going to be close,” said Edmund Langgu Saga, a widely acknowledged exponent of the art and at one time, the youngest MP in Malaysian parliamentary history.

He was 25 when he became representative for Saratok in 1963, just after Sarawak merged with the Federation. That record was overtaken by Najib Abdul Razak when became MP for Pekan at 23 in January 1976.

“Iban are great talkers. They favour as their political representatives speakers who are skilled at ‘randau ruai’,” said Langgu, who was originally from Sarawak National Party (Snap) and later Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak (PBDS) in his 23 years as MP (1963-86).

The retired former deputy minister of agriculture is currently in the final stages of compiling the first Iban dictionary.

Langgu was born in Saratok, in the middle reaches of the mighty Rajang river, the longest in Malaysia and of mythic significance to the Iban who populate its upper and middle reaches.

Before the Iban of the Saribas region, also located in the middle reaches of the Rajang but at a remove from Saratok, acquired a reputation in the mid-1900s as the best speakers of the mother tongue, it was ‘Saratok Iban’ that was the best spoken.

Using logic and humour to make a point

Langgu, 71, learned the tongue from his grandparents and uncles and was able to ascend to a level of exposition considered the highest of the ‘randau ruai’ arts. This is when your speech is larded with rhythmic couplets that blend references to historic Iban personages with current concerns.

“This is the ‘randau ruai’ of the bards,” said Langgu, regarded as the last of the exponents of this dying art, the building blocks of which are quarried in the depths of Iban folklore and lifestyle.

According to Langgu, eloquent exponents of the prosaic version of ‘randau ruai’, as distinct to the lofty bardic style, are Dunstan Endawie, the former president of Snap, the late Edwin Tangkun and Leo Moggie, both originally from Snap but  broke away to form PBDS, and James Masing, formerly PBDS and now PRS leader and state land development minister.

“A good exponent of the prosaic version of ‘randau ruai’ would be able to simplify political ideas, employ references to Iban folklore and lifestyle, and use logic and humour to make his points,” explained Langgu.

He would rate Jawah Gerang as a more skilled exponent of ‘randau ruai’ than Nicholas Bawin, the PKR election director for the Batang Ai by-election and until Jawah was announced as the PKR candidate last Monday, the leading candidate in pre-election speculation.

“Jawah’s ‘randau ruai’ is a bit rough but it is still good. As for Malcolm Mussen, nothing is known of his ability in the art. However, speaking ability is an important though not the decisive factor in elections,” offered Langgu. Mkini

Hindraf giving MIC a walkover

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Recent events show that Hindraf  willing to give MIC a walkover due to its focus on who will be the candidate for upcoming bukit selambau elections. A messy nominations can be expected.

A saying in Tamil goes like this “ when the village is divided into two, the drama troupe will be the happiest of all” (due to the fact they get to have double shows and make twice the money . Here the Drama troupe is MIC and are they glad looking at the squabbling that is going on which will give them easy victory by pushing Indians towards MIC candidate by announcing to boycott and have Independent candidate.

Looking at Sabah, we can see that Barisan nasional has always been winning at any election which has numerous candidates, there have been spoilers who are able to split votes by just being a candidate and giving BN an easy victory , for example the granny in March 2008 elections manage to grab enough votes that Mohd Sabu of PAS lost by a thin margin in Kuala Terengganu.

There are many elements who want to get Hindraf out of the way and MIC is among the top of this list. No other pressure group has been able to gather such a mass support that was gained by Hindraf. If not for police roadblocks, bus permits cancelled, IGP & Police fear mongering, vehicle search, harassment by checking mobile phones, media pressure the 2007  November 25th Peaceful Rally would have seen not 30 thousand but 300 thousand people on the streets.

Indians just had enough of MIC and the ruling BN for keeping them in the sad state of affairs out of development, marginalized and discriminated. Neither has the situation been looked upon and anything concrete being done other than churning statistics which are useless. MIC is a one man show who has shown who is the boss.

Hindraf should take MIC to task for the atrocities it has done especially in the bukit selambau area. Take for example Kg.Sungai getah 2 , which has been without water or electricity for over 50 years due to the fact that MIC wanted to keep it that way.

Some politicians were directly involved in this issue and many reports, memorandums and rallies done for this group of villagers could not help them as long as their political masters decided what outcome they wanted. Kg.Sungai Getah 2 saga can be read here
Villagers in the Dark : http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2002/1c.html
Vilagers in the Dark sequel : http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2002/5a.html

Hindraf should maintain its status quo by being a pressure group instead of squabbling over political clout. Without any power or political affliations it has been able to garner the Indian masses to support its cause and champion for all Indians in Malaysia.

This is not the time to go against anyone else but MIC. The other parties can have their own representative in the assembly but the Vision and Goals of Hindraf should go on with political power or without. MIC and BN have many tricks up their sleeve to create chaos and having Indians boycotting the PR candidate is definitely going to help.

Its time to focus on only one mission, to be rid of MICs gameplay which will keep Indians as a subservients for another 50 years. Unite against this with the Makkal Sakthi given by the people to ensure victory in Bukit Selambau.

- Senthil & Revadhi

We live in confusing times

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

By Ambiga Sreenevasan

MARCH 27 — On Tuesday, we read about the call for change and improvement by our leaders.

However, just a day or two before that, we also read about the suspension of Harakah and Suara Keadilan, the denial of media accreditation for the Umno General Assembly to The Malaysian Insider, Malaysiakini, the Nutgraph and three others, the breaking up with tear gas of the PKR rally in Bukit Selambau (and the arrest of 21 people) and, of course, the charging of Karpal Singh with sedition.

So why is there this terrible disconnect between what our politicians are saying and what is happening on the ground? Is this a case of over-zealous functionaries trying to second-guess the powers that be? If that is the case then it is easily remedied by immediately reversing these orders. However (as I suspect it is), if these orders have the approval of those at the top, then this is a case of a serious mismatch of word and deed.

This Jekyll and Hyde syndrome reflects an undignified sense of insecurity. Our leaders must make up their minds. Are they interested in upholding the rule of law and our democratic institutions or are they insistent on showing utter contempt for all that we hold dear just to protect the interests of a few? If only they would realise that they are more likely to win the popularity contest if they would instead show utter contempt for dishonesty and injustice and constancy in protecting the rule of law, the independence of our institutions and the freedoms of our people. If only they would realise that the whole world is watching us and that our platitudes on human rights (particularly at the universal periodic review that just took place) ring very hollow.

If this was a fairy tale it would be that of the “Emperor’s New Clothes”. Interestingly in that tale (as in any similar tale), what kept the emperor in denial was the presence of so-called loyal, sychophantic subjects who told the emperor only what he wanted to hear and shielded him from what was in fact the truth.

Another case of mismatch of word and deed is to be found in the case of Karpal Singh’s charge under the Sedition Act. For a start, those who formulated the charge may want to reconsider it in the light of the amendment to the Federal Constitution (pushed through Parliament when the Barisan Nasional had a two-thirds majority in the House) that set up the Special Court. Article 182(2) states that any proceedings by or against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Ruler of a state in his personal capacity shall be brought in the Special Court. Of course there is an argument that the acts of a Sultan in his official capacity are not acts done in his “personal capacity” but it has been suggested that official acts are included. The point is, Parliament, under the aegis of the Barisan Nasional, saw fit to remove the absolute immunity of the Rulers and allow for suits to be filed against them. It therefore follows that one can disagree with, and take legal action to challenge, some acts of the Ruler. Whether such a legal action falls within the ambit of Article 182(2) of the Federal Constitution is something for a court to decide if and when such legal action is instituted. In framing charges against Karpal Singh under the Sedition Act, the authorities appear to have overlooked this constitutional amendment and acted precipitately. I would argue that the particular section in the Sedition Act must be interpreted subject to the constitutional amendment.

Then there is the point of selective prosecution. Let us reflect. There are many who have commented on the Perak crisis from a legal and constitutional perspective and have discussed the actions of the Sultan. However, we must surely also recall the public discussion last year of the appointment of the Terengganu menteri besar that involved the palace. On March 19, 2008, the Attorney-General was reported to have said of our Yang di-Pertuan Agong that “His Majesty cannot interfere in the appointing of the menteri besar.” If one also recalls, it was reported that the palace’s candidate for menteri besar Datuk Ahmad Said, was initially stripped of his Umno membership and 22 assemblymen were going to boycott his swearing in as menteri besar in defiance of the palace. In fact these assemblymen were planning a protest walk from Seri Iman to Istana Tamu. Needless to say there were no prosecutions under the Sedition Act in any of these cases.

More recently, on Monday the Attorney-General put before the Federal Court for consideration four questions, every one of which involved in some way the powers of the Sultan of Perak in appointing the new menteri besar. One example is Question 2 which states : “Sekiranya jawapan kepada persoalan pertama adalah ya, persoalan seterusnya ialah sama ada perkara Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Perak tidak memberikan perkenan itu sah di sisi undang-undang.” Had the application succeeded it would have necessitated arguments on the very issues that Karpal Singh had commented on and for which he is being charged with sedition. Perhaps it is timely for a reconsideration of the charge against him in view of these inconsistences.

“Never do anything against conscience, even if the state demands it” — Albert Einstein

I have often wondered if there was not one man or woman somewhere in our great machinery of government including our parliamentarians, who felt at some point that their conscience did not permit them to carry out or support an act that was so plainly unjust, partisan and unfair. If there is, or are, resignation on principle sends a good message but those who can’t do this must at the very least make it clear that they will play no part whatsoever in acts that smack of abuse of power.

Our hope therefore ultimately lies with the people. Malaysians have changed dramatically; we are more vocal, we are not prepared to suffer in silence or to watch others suffer and most importantly we see clearly what is happening before us. We are bored with explanations or statements that insult our intelligence. We do not accept pronouncements by the authorities or those in power that lack substance. We do not “buy” the divisive rhetoric hurled at us. We are disgusted at the repressive conduct and attempts to muzzle dissent. There must be a “passive resistance” by the people against unjust actions. We have seen ordinary people producing extraordinary results when they stand firm against injustice, dishonesty and the destruction of our institutions. Indeed, what we have seen is an awakening of the will, wisdom and the collective conscience of the Malaysian people. And that is a formidable force that those in power ignore at their peril. MI

najib Altantuya tidak ada pilihan lain selain mencondong kepada gaya pemerintahan ala-mahathir

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Presiden UMNO Abdullah Ahmad Badawi hari ini menyerahkan jawatannya kepada Najib Razak dengan memberi amaran kepada bakal Perdana Menteri itu untuk tidak mengembalikan Malaysia ke zaman lama dengan mengekang kebebasan rakyat dan menekan pengkritik kerajaan.

“Jika laluan lama itu yang dipilih, saya berpandangan bahawa kita telah memilih laluan yang salah; laluan yang membawa kita ke belakang. Saya bimbang laluan tersebut akan lebih mempercepatkan berakhirnya talian hayat Umno,” kata Abdullah ketika merasmikan Perhimpunan Agung UMNO.

Abdullah dilihat sebagai menyuarakan kebimbangan umum bahawa Najib yang bakal ditabalkan sebagai Perdana Menteri akan mengheret negara kembali ke pemerintahan ala-Mahathir untuk mengukuhkan kuasanya.

Namun tidak ramai di dalam dan luar UMNO berkeyakinan nasihat Abdullah itu akan didokong oleh Najib.

“Najib tidak ada pilihan lain selain mencondong kepada gaya pemerintahan ala-Mahathir,” kata Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam Khalid Samad. “Jika Najib memberi ruang kepada rakyat untuk bersuara, keadaan beliau sendiri akan lebih parah kerana dia tahu masalah peribadinya lebih teruk berbanding pemimpin sebelumnya.”

Isu rampasan kuasa yang mencetuskan krisis dua Menteri Besar di Perak, penggunaan badan-badan seperti Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia dan polis untuk menyiasat pemimpin pembangkang serta penggunaan kekerasan oleh polis untuk menyuraikan ceramah Pakatan Rakyat semakin menyerlahkan kebimbangan umum terhadap kepimpinan Najib.

Yang terbaru ialah penggantungan permit akhbar Parti Keadilan Rakyat dan PAS selama tiga bulan yang dilihat sebagai mengekang persiapan dua parti itu menghadapi tiga pilihanraya kecil serentak pada 7 April .

Penggunaan institusi awam untuk menekan pembangkang telah lama dianggap sebati dengan pemerintahan Mahathir Mohamad sebelum beliau menyerahkan kuasa pada tahun 2003 kepada Abdullah yang kemudiannya cuba membina semula kredibiliti institusi berkenaan.

Berucap untuk kali terakhir sebagai Presiden UMNO hari ini, Abdullah berkata UMNO tidak boleh kembali kepada cara lama menguruskan rakyat.

“Ada juga yang masih berpendirian bahawa kita tidak perlu melakukan perubahan,” kata Abdullah. “Mereka mempercayai bahawa UMNO akan kembali mencapai kemenangan jika kita kembali kepada cara lama, kepada order lama, dengan menyekat kebebasan warga, dengan menghalang warga dari menyuarakan kritikan,” tambah beliau.

”Mereka berpandangan bahawa UMNO boleh terus berkuasa dan kekal kuat dengan kaedah menjaga kepentingan beberapa individu tertentu, dan memenuhi tuntutan-tuntutan kumpulan tertentu,” menurut Abdullah.

Presiden UMNO itu berkata, parti berkenaan akan mengalami natijah paling buruk jika terus “lena dalam ulitan mimpi bahagia” serta kembali kepada “laluan lama.”

Abdullah akur UMNO dibelit dengan masalah dalaman serius, khususnya rasuah politik yang semakin berleluasa di ambang peralihan kuasa dalam parti itu.

“Semakin ramai yang menyertai UMNO, bukan kerana apa yang dapat mereka sumbangkan kepada UMNO, tetapi lebih mirip kepada apa yang bakal mereka harap untuk memperoleh,” kata Abdullah.

”Mereka mengharapkan jawatan, mereka mengharapkan projek,  mereka mengharapkan gelaran, mereka mengharapkan kepuasan duniawi. Semangat berkorban, semangat berjuang, semangat berkhidmat untuk bangsa, untuk negara semakin tipis, semakin lemah,” tambah Abdullah.

Abdullah berkata retorik bahawa UMNO perlu berubah tidak bermakna tanpa kesedaran bahawa pihak yang lantang melaung sedemikian harus terlebih dahulu “melakukan perubahan dalam diri sendiri.”

Abdullah berkata UMNO akan kehilangan baki pengaruhnya jika parti itu tidak mendokong perubahan yang drastik.

“Sedarilah! Di luar Dewan Merdeka ini, ramai yang berpandangan bahawa jika UMNO dan Barisan Nasional tidak berubah, maka pilihanraya ke-12 pada 8 Mac 2008 merupakan kemenangan terakhir kepada Barisan Nasional menubuhkan kerajaan,” kata Abdullah.

“Selepas ini, rakyat di luar dewan ini, tidak akan mengundi kita lagi,” tambah Abdullah.

Sivakumar’s suit against BN-friendly reps on May 28

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

The Kuala Lumpur’s High Court today fixed May 28 to hear a leave application on a judicial review by Perak speaker V Sivakumar against three BN-friendly independents and the Election Commission.

The court also fixed the same hearing date for another similar action filed by three Pakatan’s exco members and three voters from the state.

The hearing date was decided by Justice Lau Bee Lan in chambers after meeting Sivakumar’s five counsel led by Sulaiman Abdullah. Senior federal counsel Azizah Nawawi and Amarjeet Singh represented the Election Commission.

The leave application sought by Sivakumar’s counsel and the three Pakatan state exco members is a normal procedure at the High Court to determine if the court can hear the applicants’ application.

In Sivakumar’s application, the speaker sought an order for the three BN-friendly assemblypersons to present authorities or powers stipulating they are still elected representatives for Behrang, Changkat Jering and Jelapang.

He named Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang Assemblyperson), Mohd Osman Mohd Jailu (Changkat Jering), Hee Yit Foong (Jelapang) and the Election Commission as respondents.

In addition, he is seeking:

  • that the three state seats be declared vacant and cleared following the resignation of the three representatives from Pakatan;
  • an injunction against the three respondents or their agents to make a representation that they are the rightful elected representatives and are responsible, with the functions and job as a state assemblypersons;
  • an order of certiorari to quash the EC’s decision not to call for by-elections in Behrang, Changkat Jering and Jelapang;
  • an order of mandamus (to compel) the EC to hold by-elections in the three state seats; and
  • punitive, aggravated and exemplary damages from the court as a result of the course of the action and other relief sought and awarded by the court.

Back-up application

Azizah, when met after the proceedings, said that she would be making a preliminary objection on May 26 on two reasons, namely:

  • the applicants (Sivakumar and the other Pakatan excos) have no locus standi (no legal standing) to make the application,
  • there was no arguable case following the EC’s decision not to call for elections.

She said the full arguments of the preliminary objection to oppose the action would be made known then.

Sivakumar had filed the application on March 10 in his personal capacity to ensure that he can appear in court or appoint his own lawyers to represent him and not be represented by the Perak state legal advisor Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid, as was the case in Perak.

The other review application was filed by three ousted Pakatan Rakyat exco’s namely A Sivanesan (Sungkai), Tai Sing Ng (Kuala Sepetang) and Chen Fook Chye (Keranji) along with three voters, one each from the constituency of Behrang, Changkat Jering and Jelapang.

The three voters are Ahmad Sabri Wahab, Ahmad Latip Ariffin and Foo Hong Wai representing the three constituencies where their three assemblypersons had become BN friendly representatives.

All six named the Radzi, Osman, Hee and the commission as respondents. The application was filed by the law firm Chooi & Co.

The second application is in fact serves as a back-up, just in case Sivakumar would not be allowed to be represented as in his other case in Ipoh.

In Ipoh, the three BN-friendly independents have suit Sivakumar for wrongly declaring their seats vacant and calling for by-elections. The EC however overruled the speaker and decided that the three remained state reps.

Dissolution of Balkis may have been illegal: Panel

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

SHAH ALAM (March 26, 2009) : The dissolution of Balkis, the wives of Selangor elected representatives charity and welfare organisation, in March last year may have been illegal because there was no quorum, a member of the Selangor State Assembly’s Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) suggested today.

Azmin Ali (Bukit Antarabangsa) said that according to Article 15(I) of the Balkis constitution, the organisation cannot be dissolved without the approval of at least two-thirds of its ordinary members.

“Because those present (at the dissolution meeting) were not ordinary members, the decision to dissolve the organisation was against the law,” he said.

Azmin made his remarks when the select committee was questioning state Registrar of Societies officer Tairah Yusoff in its ongoing inquiry into excesses by Balkis.

“Why did ROS not  take the responsibility to advise Putrajaya (the head office of ROS)?”  he asked Tairah.

“This is your function and responsibility as a ROS state officer, as the constitution of Balkis was approved by the state ROS.”

State Assembly Speaker Teng Chang Khim, who chaired the committee, also questioned Tairah on the matter.

“If the state office knew that several provisions were breached in the dissolution, why did the state ROS not advise the head office accordingly? he asked.

“The members who attended the meeting on March 11, 2008, were illegal members. Why did the state office keep quiet on this?”

Tairah replied: “This was the process and we did not know the rest. We looked at the constitution and the quorum. We don’t know the rest.”

Teng pointed out that it was insufficient to merely assume quorum was constituted based on mere numbers.

“The quorum is more than just numbers. One has to see the membership of the people in the quorum, whether they are all valid members. If they put in people who are not members, does that make it a valid quorum? It is not. You have to examine (the membership,” he said.

Teng said the change in the state government after the March 8 general election had to be taken into account.

“On March 8, you knew that the previous ruling party had lost and that 34 seats had changed hands. This means that 34 members (of Balkis) had lost the right to be members. This means that out of the 70 who attended (the meeting), 34 were ineligible. This means there was no quorum,” he said.

Azmin then told Tairah: “You testified that at the time, the new mentri besar (Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim) had not taken his oath of office yet. That means, there was some consideration (by ROS) at the state level.

“If you could think that the members (of Balkis) were valid as Tan Sri Khalid had yet to be sworn in, that means that a consideration was made.”

He said the consideration was not the right one and that the question of whether the new mentri besar had been sworn in was a matter of procedure.

Azmin described the action of the Selangor ROS as a “political” one, to which Tairah disagreed.
“We do not go to that level of detail,” she said.

“We do not check for the validity of members. I really did not go to that level of detail and I really did not know,” she said, adding that the state assistant registrar would know such details.
Teng then asked Tairah to provide the details of the assistant registrar, who would be called to  testify on a later date.

The other members of the select committee are Taman Medan assemblyman Haniza Talha, Ulu Kelang assemblyman Shaari Sungib, Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee, Dusun Tua assemblyman Ismail Sani (BN) and Permatang assemblyman Sulaiman Abdul Razak (BN).
The inquiry continue today. The Sun

When press freedom works both ways: Guan Eng and umno sec gen share something in common

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

AS a champion of press freedom and free speech, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has found himself in an unlikely position of being accused of attempting to silence the very institution he has taken upon himself to defend.

When newspapers were issued show-cause letters, when a reporter from the vernacular press was picked up “for her own protection” under the Internal Security Act, and when restrictions were imposed on political and religious publications, Guan Eng – a Kamunting alumnus – was among the first to voice his condemnation on the assault on the fourth estate.

Thus eyebrows were raised last year when the DAP secretary-general banned a Malay daily from covering his press conferences and events following reports of his comments on the New Economic Policy (NEP).

Upon taking over the state administration last year, Guan Eng had announced that all government procurements in Penang would be through open tender, something that the NEP did not address and encouraged cronyism and corruption. This led to reports that he was anti-NEP which later took on a racist tone.

This was followed by a war of words between him and the newspaper with each accusing the other of twisting words and lying to the public.

Having attended at least one press conference by the chief minister on that issue, having viewed recordings of his past media briefings and conferred with fellow journalists from the various Penang bureaus, I am of the opinion that in that matter as well as another one on the setting up of an inter-faith committee to promote religious understanding, Guan Eng was a victim of spin and assassination by certain media.

But he may be partly to blame on another incident which the press in Penang have been abuzz with over the last two weeks, when he had a run-in with almost every newspaper and television station when he apparently reneged on a promise not to give anymore exclusive interviews.

When word got out that he had given one to an English daily, there was hell to pay when tantrums were thrown and he was accused of playing favourites, with one other English daily writing a scathing editorial on his one year anniversary as chief minister, the lack of media savvy and poor public relations resulting in that paper being “un-invited” to all functions and press conferences.

One of his senior officers admitted that it was an unwise decision to proceed with the exclusive, but defended her boss by saying that he only agreed as it did not concern policy and was more of a personality piece.

“If theSun had asked for it, we would have definitely given you the interview,” she said, conceding that when just over a year ago most of the mainstream press had no time for the opposition, this paper had been neutral in its coverage of the general election.

Speaking to Guan Eng at his office on Tuesday, one could not help but be sympathetic but at the same time spot the flaw in his argument.

“Whatever I say seems to be spun and twisted to fit someone’s agenda,” he lamented.

This seemingly resonates with allegations from another senior state official that the order is out to demonise the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) government in the mainstream media.

As for the English paper that criticised his administration, Guan Eng said he had written a reply which has yet to be published. “Yes, I am a proponent of press freedom but such freedoms work both ways. You can whack me but at least give me an opportunity to state my case,” he said.

He said even if one has an agenda, at least accord him the right to reply.

I argued that while one sees his point, banning a member of the press or a news organisation is not doing him any favours. How does he reconcile his condemnation of the federal government over press controls with his own decision to bar certain press from his functions?

“Then, what you want me to do? We can’t keep suing them. They are a big organisation backed by a political party,” he responded.

It would seem that Guan Eng and Umno secretary-general Datuk Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor share something in common in their treatment of “agenda-mooted media”. The latter had barred several news groups, including popular online portals, from Umno’s general assembly due to their “sickening” coverage and reports on the party.

Many in Umno, including newly-appointed Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin were not in favour of this decision for fear of alienating younger members and voters who regard these news portals as giving the gospel truth.

However, Guan Eng at least redeems himself by conceding that if these “banned” media were to show up anyway, they were not going to be chased away. So this begs the question: why uninvite them in the first place?

The chief minister and his officers must realise that going head-on with the press is not always a good idea, especially – and Guan Eng acknowledges this – when one is dealing with opinion shapers with a large readership base.

There are always other means to get one’s voice across – try the popular online news portals which are ever ready to carry alternative news and views.

He should not fear the so-called biased media as those who voted for him probably do not subscribe to these papers or watch these stations anyway.

In the same vein, in the age of a more discerning public, we the media should also up our ante in reporting the facts and be responsible and articulate in our assessment of a situation.

Readers would sense when we are playing favourites and if we lose our credibility with them, it will be an uphill task regaining their trust.

In such a situation as the chief minister has been embroiled in, nobody wins when emotions rule the day and civilised rules of engagement are thrown out the window. The Sun

Terence is against any decision that curtails press freedom but acknowledges that the fourth estate in Malaysia is cursed with the burden of impartiality. He is deputy editor (special reports & investigations) and is reachable at terence@thesundaily.com

Nothing to shout about, it’s still full of corrupted individuals in supreme council: Nothing Change post umno assembly

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

KUALA LUMPUR, March 27 — Datuk Seri Najib Razak will have little choice but to break convention and look beyond yesterday’s winning Umno candidates when naming his Cabinet next month.

Otherwise he is setting himself up for rejection from a bulk of Malaysians who only 12 months ago rejected what many of these winning candidates stand for. It may have been a good day at the office for Najib with many of the candidates he and his supporters backed going first past the line but what is good enough for Umno is not good enough for the rest of Malaysia.

Nearly all of the new supreme council members are pockmarked with accusations of corruption, chauvinism, sexual harassment and sexism. Several of them, ministers in Abdullah’s much-maligned Cabinet, have a more serious charge to answer: mediocrity.

The list of winners from Wednesday and yesterday were Datuk Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Datuk Hishammuddin Hussein, Datuk Shafie Apdal, Datuk Mustapa Mohamed, Datuk Noh Omar, Datuk Musa Aman, Datuk Azian Osman, Datuk Zainal Abidin Osman, Datuk Seri Mohd Zin Mohamed, Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob, Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin, Datuk Shaziman Abu Mansor, Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi, Datuk Tajuddin Abdul Rahman, Datuk Idris Haron, Datuk Dr Abd Latiff Ahmad, Datuk Seri Jamaludin Jarjis, Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah, Datuk Dr Norraesah Mohamad, Datuk Seri Mahdzir Khalid, Datuk Ahmad Husni Mohd Hanadzlah, Datuk Hamzah Zainudin, Datuk Bung Moktar Radin, Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussin, Datuk Seri Zulhasnan Rafique, Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek, Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh, Datuk Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim, Datuk Shahrizat Jalil and Khairy Jamaluddin.

The fact is, save for a clutch, all of them are known quantities. Malaysians know these individuals very well, perhaps too well given the ready access to the Internet.

A few of them have had a stab at being ministers and have not distinguished themselves. Names such as Noh Omar, Ismail Sabri, Mohd Zin and Zulhasnan come to mind.

Several other supreme council members have made a name for themselves for all the wrong reasons. Tajudin Rahman, Puad and Bung Moktar are the posters boys of boorish behaviour in Parliament. They are heroes in the ruling party, earning kudos for standing up to the resurgent Opposition in Parliament. But they epitomise many of the qualities non-Malays find unattractive about Umno.

And this is the core of the problem facing Najib today. His party has a different value system than the rest of the country. Nearly every candidate at this year’s party elections used money or some other form of inducement to buy votes.

Many of the winning candidates received the support of the 2,500 delegates not because they were overflowing with charisma or because they possessed a stellar track record. They understood what motivated the party delegates and duly obliged.

The Malaysian Insider has learnt that Najib plans to make significant changes to the Cabinet. The defeat of Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar, Datuk Shahrir Samad, Datuk Azalina Othman Said and Datuk Rais Yatim has made the job easier for him.

But the wins for Noh Omar, Shaziman, Mohd Zin, Zulhasnan, Khairy and Shahrizat have added a few complications. He will now have to tell some of the winners the hard truth: that there is no place in the Cabinet for them.They may be given positions in government-linked companies and compensated in other ways.

If Najib really wants to convince Malaysians that he is serious about change, he will have to go outside his party, appoint six or seven individuals with unblemished records to the Senate and fast track them to his Cabinet. He has little choice because the crop of talent on show in Umno does not inspire confidence or have the wow factor.

Adakah umno berani berubah?

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

MAC 27 — Dalam ucapan perasmian Pemuda, Wanita dan Puteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak menegaskan pilihan Umno jelas, berubah atau rebah. Najib menyatakan beliau insaf bahawa generasi muda tidak menerima budaya politik Umno.

Persoalannya, adakah mesej ini datang dari hati? Kata-katanya manis, tetapi tanda-tandanya sebaliknya. Adakah beliau punya keazaman politik untuk memulakan perubahan dalam Umno?

Saya khuatir apa yang kita lihat ialah di sebalik pengisytiharan ini, Najib kelihatan masih cenderung mengambil jalan pintas untuk mengekang suara rakyat. Dengan membandingkan situasi hari ini dengan 1970, tahun di mana ayahandanya Allahyarham Tun Abdul Razak Hussein mengambilalih kuasa, Najib membayangkan pemusatan kuasa dan penghakisan kebebasan rakyat.

Baru-baru ini saya bertemu seorang teman untuk minum kopi. Beliau nasihatkan saya, tulislah sebuah buku dan terbitkannya segera. “Masa kau tak panjang aku fikir. Naik sahaja Najib, mungkin akan muncul Operasi Lalang 2! Baik lontarkan gagasan kau sebelum terlambat.”

Minggu ini kita saksikan petandanya. Harakah dan Suara Keadilan digantung. Gas pemedih mata ditembak di ceramah Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim di Bukit Selambau. Polis bertekad menghalang ceramah Anwar di Bukit Gantang.

Beberapa insiden terbaru menandakan mesej jelas cuba dihantar — Pakatan Rakyat mencetuskan kekacauan: insiden di Pejabat MCA Sungai Petani, provokasi terhadap Karpal Singh, kekacauan di Kuala Kangsar selepas kejatuhan Kerajaan Negeri yang sah di Perak. Ini mungkin memberikan justifikasi untuk sekiranya satu tindakan besar-besaran akan diambil. Rakyat harusnya berwaspada terhadap “agent provocateur” yang mencari peluang mencetuskan huru-hara.

Jika benar telahan ini, maka terbuktilah tarikan kepada pimpinan baru Umno dan Najib untuk menyekat gelombang rakyat yang mahukan keterbukaan dan perubahan. Tarikannya jelas — dalam suasana kemelut ekonomi dan politik, itu merupakan jalan pintas untuk kembali mengawal keadaan. Apatah lagi bagi mereka yang bernostalgia tentang zaman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Namun, kita harus sedar bahawa banyak kemelut yang kita hadapi hari ini akibat punah-ranahnya institusi yang kita warisi — sama ada institusi kehakiman, perkhidmatan awam dan media. Petualang terbesar yang bertanggungjawab merupakan Dr Mahathir. Beliau berusaha memusatkan kuasa kepada institusi Perdana Menteri dan melenyapkan prinsip pemisahan kuasa yang selama ini memastikan keluhuran Perlembagaan dipatuhi. Sistem yang Najib warisi jauh lebih rosak berbanding dengan apa yang wujud pada zaman ayahandanya.

Apabila Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi mewarisi pucuk kepimpinan negara, beliau memulakan proses penjenamaan semula pada tahun 2004, maka rakyat mendapat lebih ruang untuk bersuara dan berfikir. Tindakannya lebih bersopan. Beliau juga berani membebaskan Anwar.

Malangnya, Pak Lah tidak membina semula institusi-institusi tempang yang diwarisinya. Beliau mungkin tidak campurtangan sebagaimana Dr Mahathir, tetapi tindakan memperkasakan institusi juga tidak dilakukan. Beliau melantik Datuk Zaid Ibrahim bagi meperkenalkan reformasi dalam sistem kehakiman, tetapi Zaid gagal dan terpaksa meletak jawatan apabila kecewa melihat penentangan terhadap perubahan di dalam kabinet Pak Lah. BPR digantikan SPRM, tetapi di awal-awal lagi SPRM menunjukkan kegagalannya memberi imej sebagai badan bebas.

Maka kini, kita saksikan bibit-bibit bermulanya kembali ke zaman Dr Mahathir. Golongan jumud yang takutkan perubahan melonjak gembira melihat institusi-institusi kerajaan diperkakaskan dengan kasar bagi menyekat kemaraan politik rakyat. Golongan berkepentingan yang takut diketepikan ghairah memberi nasihat agar institusi PM kembali berkuasa.

Pun begitu, saya menyambut baik kenyataan Ketua Pemuda Umno yang baru, Khairy Jamaluddin dan juga rakan debat saya di TV, Datuk Puad Zarkashi yang mengkritik tindakan Umno menghalang media internet dari turut serta di dalam Perhimpunan Agung Tahunan Umno tahun ini. Saya berharap keberanian mereka tidak berakhir di situ dan dapat menentang sebarang langkah ke belakang yang diambil Umno.

Saya menaruh harapan jika rakyat terus berani menunjukkan keberanian untuk menolak dakyah lapuk pimpinan Umno ini, hasrat Umno akan gagal. Semangat yang ditunjukkan rakyat pada 8 Mac 2008 ketika mana keberanian rakyat mengejutkan bukan sahaja pimpinan Umno malah ahli nujum politik harus diperbaharui untuk menghadapi cabaran terbaru.

Kestabilan negara tidak lagi dicapai dengan politik adu-domba dan durjana. Kestabilan politik tidak boleh dicapai dengan pemusatan kuasa dan penafian hak rakyat. Pembangunan ekonomi tidak boleh dijamin dengan kerajaan yang takutkan rakyatnya.

Kali ini perjuangannya lebih getir, apatah lagi Umno sudah sedar bahawa rakyat mula menolak mereka. Tetapi dengan izin Allah s.w.t., sekiranya rakyat tidak gentar, tidak ada sebab kita tidak boleh menang sekali lagi dan menyelamatkan Malaysia yang kita cintai. Generasi mudalah memikul tanggungjawab terbesar bagi memastikan negara kita benar-benar berubah.

NIK NAZMI NIK AHMAD merupakan ADUN Seri Setia, Selangor dan turut menjawat Setiausaha Politik kepada Menteri Besar Selangor serta Exco Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia. Beliau menulis blog di www.niknazmi.com. Pandangan ini merupakan pandangan peribadi.

Ruling party chooses a new leader, but not a new direction — The Economist

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

MARCH 27 — Party conferences are seldom thrilling but this week’s gathering of over 2,500 ruling-party faithful in Kuala Lumpur has the eyes of the nation upon it. For, as Umno goes, so goes the country.

Since Malaysia’s independence from Britain in 1957, Umno’s chosen leader has always become the country’s leader. This year the torch is passing from Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, the prime minister, to Datuk Seri Najib Razak, his deputy, who is standing uncontested as Umno leader and due to be sworn in as Malaysia’s sixth prime minister next week.

But his ascension to the top has its difficulties. A resurgent opposition is riding a wave of discontent as the country slides into recession. Some types of old-fashioned repression, like the decision to suspend two opposition newspapers, no longer work in a digital age. The party is widely seen as corrupt and self-serving. Its record on economic growth and maintaining order still attracts support from older Malaysians but counts for much less with younger voters. Everyone in Umno agrees that trouble lies ahead. Can it be averted?

Najib talks of “massive changes”. But Malaysians have heard it all before, most recently in March 2008, after Umno’s dreadful showing in a parliamentary election. The spasm of introspection soon turned into a blame game and Abdullah was forced to say he would resign. The ensuing scramble for positions in Umno has done little to change a widespread view that the party has been in power too long. The only person willing to stand against Najib, the consummate insider,was Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, a veteran outsider. Such a contest might have produced a debate about the party’s direction. Instead, Tengku Razaleigh’s candidacy was quashed by party chiefs.

The underlying problem — for Umno and Malaysia — is, to use the favoured euphemism, “money politics”, meaning backhanders paid for public-sector contracts or, where Umno is concerned, seats at the high table. On March 17 the party’s disciplinary board said it had found 15 members guilty of money politics. They included Datuk Ali Rustam, chief minister of Malacca, who was campaigning to become deputy party leader. He was duly disqualified. Ali did not, however, step down as chief minister, nor is he facing criminal charges. Such episodes make talk of reform ring hollow. For all his fumbling, Abdullah seemed to recognise this. It is unclear whether anyone in the new ruling circle does. — The Economist

najib Altantuya gets core but not dream team, crackdowns to intensify

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

By Wong Choon Mei

Trade Minister Muhyiddin Yassin – the president’s man – won the coveted No 2 post in Umno, salvaging some face for his newly-confirmed boss Najib Razak, whose prestige took a wallop after members voted in candidates aligned to his predecessor in two other key positions.

Najib was confirmed as president of Umno earlier in the day. He succeeded outgoing Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who agreed not to seek re-election after an internal rebellion last year that was purportedly hatched by Najib and his mentor Mahathir Mohamad. Muhyiddin had also played a key role in Abdullah’s ouster.

But on less solid ground now is Najib. Not only his party, but the entire nation, is rating him based on whether he can get his men through to form his dream team to govern the country. As Umno is the ruling party, those who win key posts this week can expect to be included in the cabinet once Najib takes over as prime minister early next month.

However, it is clear that despite Muhyiddin’s win, Najib has not won the hearts and minds of Umno members. Instead, his popularity has waned, due in no small part to a recent string of crackdowns against dissent and a ruthless purge attempted against leaders close to Abdullah.

In the race for the deputy president’s post, Muhyiddin beat Muhammad Muhammad Taib, the Rural Development Minister close to Abdullah. He polled 1,575 votes against Muhammad’s 916.

For the three vice-presidencies, Zahid Hamidi secured 1,592 votes, Hishammuddin Hussein obtained 1,515 and Shafie Apdal 1,445 to win. All three were backed by Najib.

However, Khairy Jamaluddin – Abdullah’s son-in-law – defied the odds to clinch the Youth chief post a day ago. He defeated two other challengers including Mukhriz – Mahathir’s youngest son and the hot favourite to win.

At the same time, Shahrizat Jalil won the Women’s chief post, ousting long-time Mahathir ally Rafidah Aziz. In the supreme council, the top decision-making organ, 17 of the 25 elected members are regarded as being aligned to Abdullah.

These victories will temper Najib’s control over the party. Although his core team is in place, two key wings are now with the Abdullah camp and many of those who owe his predecessor a favour in positions of influence. There will be pressure on him to show who is boss.

“The damage to Najib has already been done. This is a clear sign that there will be multiple centers of power that will be undermining Najib from within which makes his challenge of trying to govern the country in the midst of a serious global economic slowdown even more daunting,” said political analyst Ong Kian Ming.

A return to authoritarian repression

More desperate moves can now be expected from Najib and Mahathir, as they push to tighten their grip in both the party and the country. The stakes have been raised and opposition politicians are already bracing for a crackdown, including the arrest of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.

“Khairy’s win will take away some of the humiliation that Abdullah was subjected to in the past weeks. There is still some support for him in Umno,” said KeADILan information chief Tian Chua. “But we should not be too naive about it and Pak Lah should not feel too secure. His enemies can any time hang Khairy with formal charges of corruption.”

“There is widespread expectation that Anwar will be arrested very soon. There will some trumped-up charge or other, but the real intention is to secure some breathing space for Najib to stamp his authority on the country,” said a political analyst.

Even Abdullah acknowledged the increasingly oppressive regime pursued by Najib and his advisers. Since agreeing to the power transfer last October, he has left most of the day-to-day governance of the country to Najib.

“Sadly, there are those who feel that we do not need to pursue reforms,” Abdullah said in his final presidential address. “They believe that Umno will regain its glory if we revert to the old ways – the old order, by restricting the freedom of our citizens and by silencing their criticism. If we revert to the old path I believe we are choosing the wrong path; one that will take us to regression and decay. It is a path that I fear will hasten our demise.”

The stigma of corruption

Meanwhile, critics of the flamboyant Khairy have slammed his election as a further sign that Umno was insincere about ridding itself of corruption.

“The stigma is there. No matter that he and Ali Rustam were singled out. It is still money politics, it is still corruption and there should be no excuse not to bring in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. If they are innocent, they should be cleared. If they are guilty, they should be charged,” said Tian.

As part of the purge attempted by the Najib camp, the 33-year old MP for Rembau was accused of vote buying and issued a warning letter last week. Popular vice-president Mohd Ali Rustam – the front-runner in the race for the deputy presidency – was disqualified from contesting on similar grounds.

Outraged Umno grassroots raised a hue and cry, putting Najib and Mahathir on the defensive. Political watchers predicted a swathe of sympathy votes would swing to the Abdullah camp in protest of the aggressive move. Part of that prediction came true, with Khairy and Shahrizat breaking through, although Muhammad Muhammad Taib faltered.

Said Kian Ming: “Khairy will no doubt play the role of the loyal Youth chief but he will remember what Najib tried to do to him. And when the time comes when Najib’s back is against the wall for Khairy to support Najib, then the daggers will be unsheathed, presumably, not only by Khairy but also by others, including Mohd Ali.”

Parliament adjourned, lawmakers expect rougher sessions ahead

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

By SK English Team

Parliament has adjourned sine die after a 22-day sitting that was marked by controversy, as the ruling Umno-Barisan Nasional coalition launched a barrage of attacks against Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers.

MP for Bukit Gelugor Karpal Singh was attacked at the entrance to the August House by an angry mob of Umno Youth members, angered by his statement that their party was celaka (damned).

Last week, MP for Puchong Gobind Singh Deo was suspended for a year without pay or privileges for daring to question incoming prime minister Najib Abdul Razak over his involvement in the high-profile murder case of Mongolian translator, Altantuya Shaariibuu.

And a day ago, MP for Ipoh Timur Lim Kit Siang was suspended till 1 pm for asking if Umno was power crazy during a debate on the Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Bill 2009.

“Is Umno crazy? For saying that I was suspended in Parliament. But Hishammuddin Hussein the out-going Umno Youth Leader called Anwar Ibrahim power crazy. And he became a hero,” said Kit Siang in his latest blog posting.

Rougher session ahead

With that unpleasant incident, the first sitting of the second session of the 12th Parliament that began on Feb 16 came to a close on Wednesday. Pakatan lawmakers are expecting a rougher session ahead once Najib formally takes over the premiership.

The Dewan Rakyat passed nine bills including the Supplementary Supply Bill (2008) 2009 and the Supplementary Supply Bill (2009) 2009

Seven other bills were the Witness Protection Bill 2008, Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2009, Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Bill 2008, Fees (National Agricultural Training Council) (Validation) Bill 2009.

Also passed were the Continental Shelf (Amendment) Bill 2009, Private Higher Education Institutions (Amendment) Bill 2008. The Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Bill 2009 was also.

The National Services Training (Amendment) Bill 2008 that was scheduled to its second and third reading was brought forward for the next sitting.

However, the reform bill on the police and other enforcement agencies promised by outgoing prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was postponed.

Pidato Abdullah Badawi Wajar Diteliti

Posted in Anwar Ibrahim with tags on March 27, 2009 by ckchew

Saya tidak sering mengulas ucapan Presiden UMNO. Kendati begitu pidato Datuk Seri Abdullah mengundang wacana.

Keberanian beliau membedah penyakit parti yang angkuh, pudar idealisme perjuangan dan terjebak dengan amalan rasuah agak mengejutkan sebahagian besar perwakilan. Mereka dikira menantikan sajian pujian, ungkapan lunak yang memperteguh khayalan mereka bahawa UMNO kekal sebagai wadah perjuangan bangsa yang terhebat dan terkuat.

Malah dijangkakan Datuk Seri Abdullah akan menyambung lagak ayam sabung sang satria Pemuda UMNO sabelumnya. Ukuran kehebatan bukan pada peribadi dan akhlak, program atau amalan, tetapi keangkuhan mendabik dada, menghina dan menyerang lawan.

Arakian terpingalah gelagat perwakilan mendengar pidato perpisahan; bukannya merakam penghargaan tetapi menyinggung hasrat sebahagian pimpinan, pastinya mengaitkan Datuk Seri Najib sendiri dengan kecenderungan memuja kaedah lama membungkam musuh politik dan bertindak rakus.

Beliau menyelar sikap selesa di tengah kegetiran, kerana mabuk dengan kuasa dan terus terheret dalam kencah pertarungan sesama sendiri. Tepukan perwakilan hambar dan tidak rancak.

Namun saya menganggap saranan Datuk Seri Abdullah wajar diteliti kerana turut meletakkan asas keluhuran negara berpelembagaan yang adil dan saksama. Apakah mungkin disaksikan wacana segar menyusul dalam forum perhimpunan UMNO?

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Issues of murder of Altantuya: ‘Unknown’ najib Altantuya ready to be Malaysian PM

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

There are also issues of character. Najib has been mauled on opposition-supporting internet sites that have linked him to the lurid murder of a Mongolian model, although there has been no evidence and Najib has repeatedly denied involvement.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

REUTERS

Najib Razak, who is set to be Malaysia’s sixth prime minister, has been in parliament for over 30 years, yet outside of a close coterie of friends and family he is an enigma.

On Thursday, the 55-year old who is the son of Malaysia’s second premier is to be endorsed as the leader of the United Malays National Organisation, the main party in the National Front coalition that has ruled the country for 51 years. The position effectively guarantees him leadership of the country as well.

Although Najib trained as an economist at a British university, he has little direct experience of economic management. He has held the defence and education portfolios as well as his current posts of deputy prime minister and finance minister.

“Najib is the most known unknown,” said Bridget Welsh, a Malaysia specialist at Johns Hopkins University in the U.S. He has promised to use the current global economic downturn to boost the Southeast Asian country up the economic value chain and to liberalise services, reduce dependence on commodities and oil exports as well as low-end electronics.

He has however provided few clues on how he can do that in an economy that relies on millions of cheap immigrant labourers to produce electronics that account for nearly 40 percent of the country’s exports. Whether he can do that in a country of 27 million people that imprisons people without trial, divides on racial lines and with a ruling coalition that is still wounded from its worst ever election losses at national and state level a year ago is also moot.

He has been labelled as a hardliner by Malaysia’s opposition which cites recent sedition charges against one of its lawmakers, a ban on their newspapers and pressure on opposition-supporting websites as evidence of a coming crackdown.

Najib initially appeared to promise action to end economic and social privileges for the 60 percent of the population that is Malay and that have been criticised for nurturing corruption and hampering economic growth.

But he recently backed off any “drastic” move. In his previous ministerial posts he spent lavishly and as finance minister unveiled Malaysia’s biggest ever budget spend of 60 billion ringgit to help stave off recession and layoffs in an economy that is the third most dependent on exports in Asia after Hong Kong and Singapore.

AN ABLE ADMINISTRATOR, BUT CAN HE FIGHT? The composition of the budget spending showed caution. Only 15-17 billion ringgit was new government spending, the rest came from various investment funds and bank guarantees. That measure was criticised by some economists for lack of transparency or impact, but it cannily preserved Malaysia’s credit rating and cash for a prolonged downturn where more firepower may be needed as government revenues slide. Najib is said by people who work for him to have a strong appetite for detail and he is also popular with his staff.

Married for a second time, Najib has five children and plays golf with close political allies from Malaysia’s elite and has close links to business, including his brother who heads Malaysia’s second largest bank, CIMB. Najib has taken his time to get to the top job, perhaps learning lessons from the fall of former deputy PM Anwar Ibrahim who was over eager in his bid to oust then-prime minister Mahathir Mohamad and ended up out of government and in jail. Some say that while Najib is good at details he lacks the capacity for decisive action.

Mahathir, who led the country for 22 years and is still an influential force, damned him with faint praise in a recent interview with Reuters, although much of his anger was reserved for incumbent Abdullah Ahmad Basawi who succeeded him. “Najib can do well, but we will have to see, because when I asked Abdullah to appoint him as deputy I had a lot of hope for him, but he did not perform the way I expected,” Mahathir said.

There are also issues of character. Najib has been mauled on opposition-supporting internet sites that have linked him to the lurid murder of a Mongolian model, although there has been no evidence and Najib has repeatedly denied involvement.

Nonetheless it provides a rallying point for the opposition and any in UMNO who may wish to attack Najib’s suitability to be prime minister. Those attacks are in public and becoming more intense, with an opposition legislator recently being banned from parliament for shouting “murderer” at Najib.

The honeymoon for Najib will be short, with one parliamentary by-election and two state seat by-elections on April 7. “Throughout his political career, Najib has never had to fight like this before,” said political analyst Ong Kian Ming.

Fracas at umno samseng meet: Probe sought

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

A top Umno leader has called for an investigation into a fracas between two factions of the youth wing in wake of the surprise election results late last night.

MCPX

Following the announcement that Khairy Jamaluddin had been elected Umno Youth chief, a group of about 200 supporters of his rival, Muhkriz Mahathir, held a protest in PWTC where the party’s annual general meeting is being held.

“Khairy, rasuah,” they shouted, accusing the newly-elected Youth leader of vote-buying.

The angry group was then confronted by about 200 Khairy supporters and this led to both sides taunting each other.

As the crowd grew unruly, police were called in to form a human barrier to keep the two groups apart.

At 12.20am, about 45 minutes after the impromptu protest, both groups were eventually dispersed by the police and the situation returned to normal.

In a shock result yesterday, Khairy won the wing’s top post by a narrow margin, edging out two other candidates including the son of former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Foreign Minister Rais Yatim, who is vying for the party’s vice-president post, today called for an investigation into the incident.

“The Umno majority voice has spoken but there seems to be a disgruntled situation where people were talking about corruption against Khairy,” he told AFP.

Ghost of Altantuya: Harsher crackdowns including Anwar’s arrest expected

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

By Wong Choon Mei

In a telling victory, Khairy Jamaluddin – the son-in-law of outgoing Umno president Abdullah Ahmad Badawi – defied the odds and his greatest enemies in the party to clinch the Youth chief post.

However, political watchers warn his triumph may be short-lived and the stage is now set for a major crackdown by prime minister-designate Najib Abdul Razak.

“The win will take away some of the humiliation that Abdullah was subjected to in the past weeks. From the voting pattern, it is clear there is still some support for him in Umno,” said KeADILan information chief Tian Chua

“But we should not be too naive about it and Pak Lah should not feel too secure. His enemies can any time hang Khairy with formal charges of corruption. Even we in the opposition are expecting a major crackdown very soon against our own members, especially against Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.”

The shock outcome will surely displease Najib, the incoming Umno president, and his mentor, ex-premier Mahathir Mohamad, whose son Mukhriz was also fighting for the same post. In fact, Khairy’s victory should serve as a real warning, especially as Shahrizat Jalil won the Women’s chief post on the same night, ousting long-time Mahathir ally Rafidah Aziz.

More desperate moves can now be expected from the Najib-Mahathir camp, as last week’s ruthless purge against Abdullah’s men backfire in a clear sign that their own popularity may be waning even faster than their rival’s.

The stakes have been raised and how severe and immediate their reaction will be depends on the outcome of the contests for the three vice presidencies and in particular the deputy president’s post.

Harsher crackdowns including Anwar’s arrest expected

The No 2 post to Najib’s No 1 in the party is being contested by another Abdullah associate, Muhammad Muhammad Taib, who will take on Najib’s favoured candidate, Trade Minister Muhyiddin Yassin.

All eyes are also on whether Najib’s cousin, Education Minister Hishammuddin Hussein, will capture one of the hotly-contested VP seats. Like Mukhriz, Hishammuddin was a clear favourite at the outset, but his popularity has dropped since nominations closed in November.

At that time, and fanned by the Najib-Mahathir camp, fear had gripped the party that their dominance would soon be overtaken by the Pakatan Rakyat. That insecurity has since diminished and many have come to view a two-coalition system as a good check-and-balance against the excesses of their own leaders.

In fact, along with other Malaysians, some believe the best way to pull the country and the economy out of the current political turmoil would be the formation of a unity government – a power sharing between the two coalitions.

Many also do not want the scandal-plagued Najib to become prime minister because of the string of unresolved graft allegations against him, including the high-profile murder-and-commission case of Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu.

A recent series of heavy-handed suppressions including the banning of two opposition newspapers, rough police action towards crowds attending opposition rallies and a botched and unpopular power grab in Perak, have also worked against Najib.

With so much going against him, he is expected to take it out on Anwar, the reform icon rated as having the best chance of leading a popular revolt against him.

“There is widespread expectation that Anwar will be arrested very soon. There will some trumped-up charge or other, but the real intention is to secure some breathing space for Najib to stamp his authority on the country,” said a political analyst.

“He and Mahathir will show the iron-fist. There will be a lot of doublespeak, but Malaysians  should not be simplistic about it. With so much political turmoil, how can the economy function, who would have confidence about the type of governance and system in the country?.”

Stigma of corruption

Meanwhile, critics of the flamboyant Khairy – who stepped on many toes apart from Mahathir’s – slammed his election as a further sign that Umno was insincere about ridding itself of corruption.

“The stigma is there. No matter that he and Ali Rustam were singled out and that giving ‘petrol money’ is rampant and practised by all the other leaders,” said Tian.

“It is still money politics, it is still corruption and there should be no excuse not to bring in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. If they are innocent, they should be cleared. If they are guilty, they should be charged.”

In last week’s purge, the 33-year old MP for Rembau was accused of vote buying and issued a warning letter. Popular vice-president Mohd Ali Rustam – the front-runner in the race for the deputy presidency – was disqualified from contesting on similar grounds.

Outraged Umno grassroots raised a hue and cry, putting Najib and Mahathir on the defensive. Political watchers predicted a swathe of sympathy votes would swing to the Abdullah camp in protest of the aggressive move.

So far, part of their prediction has come true. Last night, Khairy topped with 304 votes, Mukhriz last with 232, and Khir in the middle at 252.

Shahrizat trounced ‘Iron Lady’ Rafidah Aziz for the top women’s post with a majority of 227 votes, polling 507 versus the latter’s 280.

All eyes are watching to see if Abdullah’s influence can now extend to the No 2 post in the party from which he was forced to agree to stand down, in the wake of the disastrous electoral performance in March 2008. SK

Effect of Ghost of Altantuya: A Return To Authoritarian Repression

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

By Tian Chua

Malaysians view with great shock the signals that the incoming Najib Razak administration is giving to the general populace as he prepares to assume power.

The harsh clampdown on media freedoms and the right to assemble this last week alone suggest that severe repressive measures may be the hallmark of Najib’s ascendancy to the premiereship.

His comparison of our current situation to the post 1969 era foreshadows a return to the policies of both Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, and his father Tun Abdul Razak who imposed Emergency rule on Malaysia.

Hishamuddin Hussein specifically targeted Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim in his speech, demonising him and making veiled allusions to entrapment and imprisonment, seemingly laying the ground for a wave of mass arrests such as was seen in Operasi Lalang.

This last week the newspapers of two opposition political parties were suspended without any plausible reason by the Home Ministry – a move which undoubtedly smacks of an intention to silence the legitimate voices of Malaysians who do not see eye to eye with the powers that be.

On a more visceral level, the heavy handed actions of the police in breaking up to Pakatan Rakyat political rallies in Bukit Selambau and Bukit Gantang have shown that Najib is perfectly willing to cause grevious physical harm to Malaysian citizens merely to ensure that they do not get the opportunity to hear opposing views and decide the truth for themselves.

Distracting attention from Altantuya

International media reports have increasingly put Najib in a bad light, raising burning and as of yet unanswered questions about his involvement in the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya as well as the connected payment of hundreds of millions of dollars in commissions for shady arms deals.

It is shameful that the designated Prime Minister of Malaysia would have to face such scandals in the eyes of the international community.

We fear that part of the effort to distract attention from the controversies surrounding his person, Najib may reenact the strategies of Mahathir Mohammad, and embark on a massive campaign of arrests and detentions without trial of prominent Pakatan Rakyat leaders within days of his swearing in.

KEADILAN and Pakatan Rakyat reaffirm their commitment to resist and speak out against any and all attempts to suspend civil liberties and pursue courses of action that run counter to the spirit and letter of the law.

We will do everything in our power to ensure that the integrity and well being of the Malaysian people, our Constitution as well as truth and justice are vigorously safeguarded, to be delivered safely to generations to come.

[Tian Chua is a Pakatan Rakyat leader and MP for Batu. He is also information chief of KeADILan.]

Anwar Ibrahim Club (AIC) bangkit membidas tohmahan Hishammuddin

Posted in Anwar Ibrahim with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

KUALA LUMPUR, 26 Mac (SK): Timbalan Persident Kelab Anwar Ibrahim (AIC), Hidayat Saifuddin tampil mengecam tindakan Hishamuddin Hussein yang berucap di persidangna Umno semalam

Kenyataan beliau berbunyi:

“Maka gegak gempitalah Ketua Pemuda Umno dengan hamburan demi hamburan yang dituju kepada  Anwar Ibrahim.Tidak cukup dengan fitnah dan kezaliman yang dilancarkan ke atas Pakatan Rakyat, hari ini Hishamuddin  Hussien disamping menjulang keris, melalak lagi.

Kononnya mempertikaikan dasar yang lapuk dan usang dianggap salah. Kononnya usaha menyanggah kesalahan pemerintah dan menawarkan alternatif yang lebih baik dikira satu petualang.

Apakah mempersoalkan dasar afirmatif yang menindas dikira satu tindakan yang salah?Kita sama sekali tidak akan menafikan hak melayu bumiputera sebagaimana yang dijelaskan di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan, tetapi yang dipersoalkan ialah tindakan menghalalkan penguasaan sesetengah pihak untuk memastikan khazanah negara dibolot rakus oleh hubaya-hubaya yang angkuh dan sanggup menindas bangsa sendiri di atas nama bangsanya.

Kita tidak bersetuju dengan kebebasan tanpa limitasi dan tanggungjawab,tetapi kita juga sama sekali tidak bersetuju dengan tindakan menyekat kebebasan media, kebebasan bersuara dan kebebasan berhimpun sebagaimana dititip jelas dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Di bawah regim Umno-BN, menempelak pemerintah  tatkala mereka melakukan kesalahan adalah dosa yang maha besar.

Sebaliknya budaya ampu,julang menjulang adalah mauduk wajib jika mahu terus kekal di persada.

Menempelak Anwar Ibrahim sebagai petualang melayu hanya memalitkan si penuduh semata-mata.

Mana lebih dasyat: memperjuangkan keadilan untuk semua atau membunuh potensi bangsa melalui sistem pendidikan yang rapuh yang mengabaikan kelangsungan bahasa ibunda?

Mana lebih keparat: memupuk persefahaman membentuk kerajaan atas dasar prinsip perjuangan, atau menjatuhkan kerajaan pilihan rakyat dengan berselindung di balik imuniti istana?

Mana lebih khianat: memperjuangkan dasar tadbirurus yang kompeten,adil dan telus atau mempertahankan dasar yang menindas, mengayakan puak sendiri, dan membunuh potensi orang lain?

Mana lebih bangsat: memupuk perpaduan antara kaum ke arah menjulang ketuanan rakyat, atau menyemai kebencian atas sentimen perkauman yang sempit, jumud dan kolot?

Gema di dalam Dewan Tun Dr Ismail di PWTC mungkin menggamit suasana,tetapi apakah mungkin rakyat terkesan dengan retorik tahunan yang bergema atas sentimen sempit yang makin parah dan usang?

Hishamuddin boleh terus berkokok, dan Pemuda Umno boleh terus bersorak. Tetapi rakyat masih kenal fungsi akal: untuk menilai secara rasional, mempertahankan yang hak dan membunuh kebathilan!

HIDAYAT SAIFUDDIN
Timbalan Presiden
KELAB ANWAR IBRAHIM (AIC)

http://www.anwaribrahimclub.com/

Banglow mewah 10 bilik RM27 juta milik siapa?

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

SHAH ALAM , 26 Mac (SK):  Banglow yang dikatakan lebih hebat daripada Mahligai arwah Zakaria Mat Derus yang terletak di Jalan Suasa, Seksyen 7, Shah Alam ini masih dalam pembinaan walaupun negara kita mengalami krisis kewangan.

Kalau nak tahu, mungkin cebisan bajet mini telah terlebih dahulu sampai ke tangan pemilik banglow ini yang dikatakan bahawa tuan empunya hanyalah seorang pegawai Kerajaan Negeri semasa pentadbiran Barisan Nasional di Selangor.

Harganya dikatakan sebanyak RM27 juta, betapa besar dan mewahnya kediaman kepunyaan khabarnya seorang ahli politik Umno yang dulunya bos besar di Selangor namun sejak kerajaan Umno-BN tumbang jadilah ia wakil rakyat biasa.

Yang peliknya, beliau masih boleh meneruskan kerja-kerja menyapkan pembinaan banglow tersebut.

Begitulah kisahnya sebuah rumah yang boleh dikategorikan sebagai mahligai atau lebih sesuai istana yang terletak sergam indah di Shah Alam, ibu negeri Selangor.

Tidaklah pula diketahui pencen ahli politik sebegitu besar sampai mampu membiayai pembinaan rumah yang sebegitu mahal dan canggih, sebab dengar-dengar rumahnya “fully eletronic”.

Tapi setakat maklumat yang dipaparkan dalam laman web kerajaan negeri Pakatan Rakyat selangor, gaji paling tinggi ahli politik Selangor pun ialah gaji Menteri Besar Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat Khalid Ibrahim sekitar RM47 ribu sebulan campur elaun.

Penulis sebuah blog mendakwa, tempat letak kereta pun dikatakan boleh muat 30 ke 50 buah kenderaan dan rumah pula dikelilingi tembok yang besar seperti Tembok Besar China.

Anwar Ibrahim’s By-election campaign calendar

Posted in Anwar Ibrahim with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

Appended below is the schedule for Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim’s by-election campaign in Bukit Selambau, Kedah and Bukit Gantang, Perak

Bukit Selambau

Date : 26/03/09
Venue: Bukit Selambau, bertemu jentera pengundi di lokaliti Taman Bandar Baru
Time : 9 pm
Contact Person: Sdr Saiful Izham 012 2962642

Date : 27/03/09
Venue: Masjid Taman Ria (solat jumaat)
Time: Waktu Zohor
Contact Person: Sdr Saiful Izham 012 2962642

Date : 27/03/09
Venue: Menziarahi mangsa keganasan FRU (Hospital Metro Sg Petani)
Time: 3 pm
Contact Person: Sdr Saiful Izham 012 2962642

Bukit Gantang

Date: 27/03/09
Venue: Dewan Masyarakat Cina Kuala Sepetang.
Time : 6 to 7 pm
Contact Person: Hj Ismail(012 5080 344)

Date : 27/03/09
Venue: Masjid Kuala Terung
Time : Waktu Maghrib/Isyak
Contact Person: Hj Ismail(012 5080 344)

Report lodged against ‘Kill Nizar’ blog

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

A police report has been lodged against a blog for allegedly inciting people to cause physical harm against ousted Perak menteri besar Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin.

MCPX

The report was lodged by Titi Serong state assemblyperson Khalil Idham Lim at the Changkat Jering police station this afternoon.

“The blog post is insulting and is inciting (people to cause Mohd Nizar harm). Mohd Nizar’s safety is being threatened. We believe this is against the law,” said Khalil.

Khalil was referring to the Perak Bangkit blog which posted an article titled “Kill Nizar!!!” which said that Mohd Nizar had broken his oath as a state assemblyperson.

“In his oath, he had said ‘In the name of god, I Nizar Jamaluddin swear that I will be loyal to the sultan. Nizar broke Article 47 (1) of the state constitution by refusing to step down (as menteri besar) after being ordered by the sultan,” read the article.

The article also included a picture of a woman in a miniskirt with the words “kill nizar” scribbled across her bare back.

Khalil said that the blog is well known in Perak and believed that the blog owner posted the article in view of Mohd Nizar’s candidacy for the Bukit Gantang by-election.

Flag war in full swing

In another development, both Barisan Nasional candidate Ismail Saffian and Mohd Nizar have been making quiet rounds throughout the constituency with little notice to the press.

More overt campaigning can be found on main roads throughout the constituency which has been given a ‘facelift’ with campaign materials, even though campaigning officially begins on March 29.

Party flags – with Barisan Nasional flags vastly outnumbering those from PAS – have been strung along the main road of Simpang, north of the constituency, all the way south towards Beruas and Pantai Remis.

However, numerous party flags and posters have been destroyed due to heavy rain in the evenings.

The warning by Election Commission chairperson Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof against illegal campaigning before nomination day appears unheeded as party workers were seen erecting new banners and flags this afternoon.

Campaign leaflets from both BN and Pakatan are also in heavy circulation. Most Pakatan materials are focusing on the controversial takeover of the Perak state government last month.

A full colour caricature leaflet portraying Mohd Nizar as a communist leader, is also making its rounds in the area. Mohd Nizar was depicted holding a DAP flag on the way to the palace.

The poster, which is not attributed to any party and has no information on the publisher, also depicts Perak speaker V Sivakumar, Perak DAP chair Ngeh Khoo Ham and Perak DAP secretary Nga Kor Ming as communists.

‘Instant noodles’ up for grabs

Several major roads have also been freshly paved while new street lamps have been erected in the town of Simpang, which is under the Changkat Jering constituency.

In Changkat Jering town, workers were seen putting on a new roof on a pedestrian bridge which is a stone’s throw away from the service centre of Changkat Jering state assemblyperson Osman Jailu. The PKR logo has been dropped from its signboard.

Osman was among three Pakatan state reps who defected from the coalition and became “Barisan-friendly” independents in early February.

On March 14, incoming Umno president Najib Abdul Razak said that BN would not be dishing out ‘instant noodle’ projects during the Bukit Gantang by-election.

“Instant noodle development politics is when we see excavators going in during elections … in Bukit Gantang, we don’t do this but development will still be brought.

“Instant noodle projects include paving roads, clean ups or other instant projects  which crop up prior to an elections. This attitude has to change,” Bernama quoted Najib as saying. Mkini

Speaker raps ROS for illegal dissolution of Balkis

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew
By Neville Spykerman

SHAH ALAM, March 26 – More questions than answers were raised today during a public inquiry on the Wives of Selangor Elected Representative Charity Organisation (Balkis), which was dissolved by the Registrar of Societies (ROS) on Feb 11 this year.

Selangor Speaker Teng Chang Khim lashed out at the ROS for dissolving the charity based on an Emergency General Meeting (EGM) by members who had no voting rights in March 11 last year.

Selangor ROS officer Tairah Yusof, who continued her testimony before the Selangor Select Committee for Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat), raised the ire of the committee when she admitted that no checks were made on the composition of Balkis members who voted to dissolve the charity.

In her testimony, Tairah said 70 out of the 100 Balkis members had attended the meeting to vote for the dissolution and this surpassed the quorum requirement of 64 members.

However, Teng asked Tairah how these 70 women – most of whom were no longer members as their husbands lost in the elections – could have voted. He said they were, at best, associate members who could not vote, according to their own constitution.

He added that based on records, Selangor had 56 assemblymen, 22 Parliamentarians, five senators and a speaker, so membership could not be more that 84.

“Even a Standard Three pupil will know the membership will not reach 100 and the ROS did not carry out its duties according to the Societies Act.”

Teng added that it’s the ROS that should be dissolved for failing to carry out its responsibilities.

The public inquiry continues tomorrow.

Waging a war against termites in S’wak

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

Now, the talk of the town is all about Umno and the general assembly.

MCPX

The banning of Mohd Rustam Ali will add numerous variables to the election of the Umno top posts and their supreme council.

But I am sceptical that this general assembly will be the beginning of a make-over of this once most powerful political party in Malaysia. You cannot really teach new tricks to an old dog. The actors may change, but the script and the plot have been etched in stone.

Being the only Sarawakian on the Malaysiakini writing team, I feel obliged to continue commenting on the Batang Ai by-election. I am quite certain many Pakatan Rakyat supporters in Peninsular Malaysia are hungry for news from the other side of the South China Sea.

Again, the Sarawak bloggers prove to be a valuable source of all kinds of information that will never be carried by the mainstream  papers.

I did made a trip back to Sarawak last weekend with Haris Ibrahim (right), Zorro Unmasked and Delcapo for an exploratory visit to see how we could hook up with the Sarawak bloggers.

We met up with quite a few of their Sarawak counterparts; some of them took the Barisan Rakyat team all the way to the longhouses in Batang Ai.

The visitors were even taken to PKR candidate Jawah Gerang’s longhouse, where Haris had the honour and courage of handling some skulls.

Upon their return, these three gentlemen expressed their satisfaction with the trip, saying that the visit was more than productive.

Meanwhile, quite a few Barisan Rakyat bloggers are on a staggered scheduled to fly over to Kuching, on their way to Batang Ai, to campaign, observe, and perhaps to blog. I hope their visit will be an alternative way of forging national integration.

Betting on elections

But the Sarawak blogsphere is still buzzing with all kinds of alternative news.

On his latest posting, Audie61 had this latest tit-bit on the betting world. Before the PKR announced its candidate, the betting was in favour of BN, giving a handicap of 1,000 votes even. But now, it is betting on the PKR candidate, giving a handicap of 78 cents to the ringgit to BN in favour of PKR’s Jawah.

pkr batang ai sarawak state election campaign 100309 06I contested as a candidate eight times in Kuching, and the massive betting often made me feel like a race horse, or a fighting cock. Betting on election results is illegal and immoral, but you try telling that to the compulsive gamblers! One of my supporters lost an entire house!

Many Ibans love to bet on cock fights, and some have lost their land over such a seemingly harmless pastime. They may just indulge themselves on the two fighting cocks in the by-election.

Betting can also be used to influence the outcome of the Batang Ai by-election.

The latest betting trend narrated by Audie61 seems to work against the PKR candidate, and so could be the work of a wealthy conglomerate trying to influence the outcome of polling on April 7.

Meanwhile, in his latest posting on The Broken Shield, Joseph Tawie reported that two local Iban individuals – Johnny Chuat and Linang Merujun – may also enter the fray as individuals. In any election or by-election, you always get individuals like that whose head gets feverish and bloated.

Joseph Tawie also made some worrisome revelation of the carrot-and-stick tactic applied on the community leaders and village chiefs of Batang Ai.

alfred“Last week, Deputy Chief Minister and deputy president of PBB Alfred Jabu Numpang gave lectures to about 100 tuai rumah (village heads) in the Batang Ai constituency.

“Yesterday (March 22), PRS state assemblyman Snowdan Lawan of Balai Ringin also lectured 39 tuai rumah from Batang Ai and told them they “are part of the government and therefore have an important role to play”. They must show good example by not inciting their own people to go against BN and must tell their “anembiaks” to vote for BN. Later the tuai rumah was given a free and guided tour of Kuching.

“On March 14, several tuai rumah from Batang Ai were asked to meet MP for Sri Aman, Masir Kujat who told them that they were “eyes and ears” of the BN and report to BN any “suspicious” characters who are trying to get their support for the opposition.

“Today, several more tuai rumah were asked to meet deputy president of PRS Joseph Entulu Belaun and to receive their “angpows” of minor rural projects. Wai FM (RTM Iban) made the announcement that they must see the deputy minister this afternoon.”

Elect the tuai rumah

If past practice in Sarawak is a guide, these tuai rumah will be summoned by BN people a few days before polling. They will be instructed on how to vote, and then a large sum of money will be given to them, to be distributed among the voters in their respective longhouse on polling eve.

Perhaps, the voters will be given a small deposit first, and a large sum will await them if the BN manok (cock) wins eventually.

pkr batang ai sarawak state election campaign 100309 08The tuai rumah is appointed by the government, often on the recommendation of the local BN elected rep, is answerable to the district officer, and gets paid RM450 a month. They are also the most authoritative figure in the longhouse. Naturally, the BN will use them as mere tools to enslave the Iban people.

Sarawak PKR should make the pledge to return political independence to the Dayak people in Sarawak, by promising that, should they come to power, the village chiefs should be democratically elected by the villagers themselves before they are recognised by the state government.

Another worthy Sarawak blogger, Sarawak Head-hunter reproduced a story from Michael Prentice of the Canadian newspaper the Ottawa Citizen (Jan 19, 2009). I checked the Ottawa Citizen Online and found the story to be authentic as Sarawak Head-hunter had quoted.

The original report in the Canadian newspaper reveals that Sean Murray and his wife Jamilah Taib own the second most expensive mansion in Ottawa, valued at something like RM28 million.

Murray is a developer, so he may be independently wealthy. But Jamilah Taib is the daughter of Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud. Most informed Sarawakians know roughly about the wealth and the opulent lifestyle of the Taib clan.

Exactly how much they have in terms of timber concessions, land, corporate holdings, and personal cash is a matter of speculation; their collective wealth must be greater than whatever you can think of. Again, go check out Sarawak Head-hunter’s latest posting.

Sarawak is a resource rich state, and the people are among the poorest in the whole country. One wonders why?

During my recent trip to Kuching, I bumped into an old friend who is a plumber by profession. Naturally, our conversation over a cup of excellent coffee peculiar to Sarawak turned to politics.

He declared that the number one problem in Sarawak is the termite.

Seeing the puzzlement on my face, he explained, ”The termite is the most pestilential pest on earth. It eats everything despite its small size. It eats even sh##! In Mandarin, the word ‘termite’ is pronounced as Bai Ma Yi!”

War against termites

The light came to my dumb skull at last, and we had a good laugh. ‘Bai Ma Yi’ in Mandarin sounds pretty close to ‘White Hair’, the universal nickname given to the CM of my home state by his disloyal subjects.

There has been some discussion of what the issue ought to be highlighted by the PKR at the Batang Ai by-election.

For me though, there is only one issue at hand, at the Batang Ai by-election and any future election for that matter. All elections in Sarawak for blue-blooded Anak Sarawak are an exercise in extermination of the termite outrage. If the BN candidate Malcolm Mussen gets elected, he will just be another junior termite.

I am enraged to see this army of senior and junior termites descending upon Batang Ai, playing their scratched record of politics of development.

The poverty level for Sarawakians is RM540 per month per household. I doubt too many poor Ibans in Batang Ai are above the poverty level. As they get poorer, the insatiable swarm of termites get richer.

The contest in Batang Ai is not merely between PKR and PRS, or between Malcolm Mussen and Jawah Garang. It is a small battle in a long war between the people of Sarawak against the termites in the fair Land of the Hornbill.

Finally, I am tired of talking about Sarawak bloggers. Together with a group of like-minded friends from all ethnic communities, we have just started our new kid on the Sarawak blog the Hornbill Unleashed.

Our guiding principle is Anak Sarawak, Bangsa Malaysia.

Agi idup, agi ngeleban! Mkini



SIM KWANG YANG was opposition MP for Bandar Kuching in Sarawak from 1982 to 1995. He can be reached at kenyalang578@hotmail.com.

‘No confidence in najib Altantuya as PM’ petition sent to 142 MPs

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

A ‘no confidence in Najib as PM’

MCPX

petition, initiated by socio-political blogger Haris Ibrahim, was sent to 142 members of Parliament yesterday. The petition urges the legislators to voice out their lack of confidence towards the incoming prime minister.

Of the 142 MPs, comprising BN and Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers, who received the petition, 24 were notified by letter and the rest by e-mail.

They represent the 142 constituencies of the approximately 5000 private citizens who have signed the petition as of this morning.

The petition directed the MPs to demand for a royal commission to be set up to investigate the allegations linking Najib Abdul Razak to the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shariibu, and make public the findings and recommendations.

The petition also urges the MPs to inform the king that with the serious allegations left unanswered, they have no confidence in Najib if the government fails to establish the aforementioned commission.

According to Haris, a copy of the petition and its signatories will also be forwarded to the king.

Among other things, the petition cited the disappearance of Altantuya’s immigration records and private investigator P Balasubramaniam, SMSes exchanged between Najib and his aide Razak Baginda, and the subsequent acquittal of Baginda as incidents that cast serious doubts on Najib’s integrity.

“Najib’s suitability to be prime minister has come under serious scrutiny by the international media, and in turn by the international community.

“It is in the interest of our country that the person chosen to become prime minister does not assume office with such baggage, namely allegation of involvement with events leading to the involvement of a foreign national”, stated a press statement released by Haris.

He also emphasised that there was no constitutional obligation on the king to appoint the president of Umno as prime minister, adding that it was a tradition that has to be re-examined.

Nurul commends Haris

Contacted this morning, Haris told Malaysiakini that of the MPs who received the petition, only Nurul Izzah Anwar (Lembah Pantai) has responded thus far.

She commended Haris Ibrahim for creating the petition and remarked that the initiative gave her hope in the country.

However, she did not say whether she would undertake the actions as implored in the petition.

When pressed on whom he thinks should replace Najib as prime minister, Haris replied,

“Pak Lah can stay on as PM. The other alternative is to form a unity government comprising of BN and Pakatan leaders.

Whichever way, anybody can become PM but Najib”, said Haris, adding that he will be taking further steps over the next few days to persuade more members of the public to push forward the message that they do not have confidence in Najib as head of the government.

Meanwhile, the petition, launched on January 4, 2009, is still open for signing. Mkini

Newspapers Suspended: Pakatan Rakyat Handover Memorandum to Suhakam

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

For Anwar, complacency is now the enemy

Posted in Anwar Ibrahim with tags , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

By Adib Zalkapli

KUALA LUMPUR, March 7 — When PKR surprisingly won the highest number of seats among the opposition parties, it was evident that the party would face problems managing its success as party leaders scrambled for positions and rewards.

Even before the formation of the PKR-led Selangor state government last year, party leaders and activists made a beeline to meet de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to lobby for senatorships, government contracts and even city councillor posts.

Some even openly demanded more opportunities and greater roles in Pakatan Rakyat-controlled states.

At the PKR Youth congress late last year, the topic of government rewards and contracts dominated the policy speech and the debate.

But on the eve of the first anniversary of March 8, the Opposition Leader issued a stern warning to leaders who asked to be rewarded after the party’s impressive performance.

“I had a special session with party stalwarts last weekend and we acknowledge there is a danger of complacency and lethargy creeping in and there is a need to rejuvenate and probably without dubious elements like those who consider Pakatan Rakyat governments as the means for them to reap benefits.

“So we made it categorically clear we cannot condone such excesses. We were given a mandate to serve with a clear agenda, we cannot depart from that,” said Anwar when met at Parliament last week.

He even challenged members who threatened to quit the party if their demands are not fulfilled to leave.

“There is a danger of complacency and people trying to resort to ultimatums or demands which I consider unreasonable.

“They probably have forgotten, some of them at least, the ideals of the party and their party agenda. So I think that was a timely reminder. You wish to support the agenda you remain, you wish to enrich yourself you join Umno,” said Anwar when asked on the motivation behind his harsh speech.

But overall he was satisfied with the progress made by PR states especially in terms of service and efficiency in governance and their success in becoming more inclusive.

“At the same time you find a semblance of greater confidence and willingness to embrace the Chinese and Indians as a team and this is generally well regarded by many,” said Anwar.

But the immediate challenge faced by Anwar and his coalition is what he claimed to be the continuous attempts made by Barisan Nasional leaders to topple PR governments by resorting to “kidnappings and threats”, which resulted in the collapsed of the Perak government.

“In Perak, they managed to kidnap two and threatened them and you can see there is a stalemate. We want to go back to the people for a fresh mandate but they refused.

“We want to convene a special assembly and they have also rejected, so it is very odd for this country not to agree to have a fresh mandate from the people or to disallow us from having a proper sitting of the assembly,” said Anwar.

He did not rule out speculation that Kedah and Selangor have become BN’s targets after former Bukit Selambau representative V. Arumugam was forced to resign and the swift action by the newly-formed Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission in investigating Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim over the purchase of cattle and maintenance of his personal car.

“This means they have not given up on draconian methods to seize power,” said Anwar. MI

Fear of Ghost of Altantuya: najib Altantuya try to re-introduce hard-line Mahathirism

Posted in Malaysia news with tags on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

From Wall Street Journal

As Najib Razak takes power, the ruling party must not return to its old ways.

In 2001, as Mahathir Mohamed’s long tenure as prime minister was in its final years, we wrote that Malaysia was “in danger of stepping back from the world of democracy and the Internet into a darker age of racial conflict and government repression.” Eight years later, with the economy deteriorating and politics in turmoil, that threat looms again.

Dr. Mahathir’s protege, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak, is set to be elected today as leader of the United Malays National Organization, the leading party in the coalition that has governed the country since independence in 1957. Next week he is expected to take over as prime minister, replacing the moderate and mostly ineffective Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. During his six years in office, Mr. Abdullah made scant progress in efforts to end political corruption, liberalize the economy and reform the judiciary. The unpopular premier led UMNO to a dismal performance in elections a year ago.

Mr. Najib’s ascension to power has been marked by a government crackdown on UMNO’s political opponents and on free speech. On Monday, police fired tear gas on a rally in Kedah as opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim was speaking to the crowd. Also this week, reporters from popular online media, including Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider, were denied credentials by the party to cover the UMNO party congress taking place in Kuala Lumpur.

Most worryingly, the government this week shut down two opposition party newspapers. The ban is for three months — long enough to get past the April 7 by-elections for three parliamentary seats that the opposition is keen to snag. It’s also long enough to get past the expected verdict next month in a sensational murder trial to which the opposition links Mr. Najib; Mr. Najib vehemently denies any involvement and says he did not know the victim. As reported in a Journal news story this week, Mr. Anwar said he believes the papers were shuttered in part to keep them from repeating allegations of corruption in weapons purchases when Mr. Najib was defense minister. Mr. Najib has denied allegations of corruption.

The government’s new restrictions on the press come on the heels of UMNO’s moves against the opposition party in Perak, where it recently persuaded three state parliamentarians to switch alliances, thereby shifting the state government’s balance of power in UMNO’s favor. The sultan of Perak validated the move, the opposition contested it and a court case is under way. But a lawyer who said the sultan’s decision was unconstitutional and suggested he might sue the sultan was charged with sedition last week. Six Internet users who made critical comments on the sultan’s Web site were also charged with insulting the sultan under the country’s new cyber law.

In Dr. Mahathir’s era, the UMNO-led government could get away with such tactics. Under his watch, the country saw opposition media silenced and political dissidents jailed. But in today’s Malaysia, where voters are beginning to realize the power of the ballot box, it’s a risky political gambit. Mr. Anwar led his opposition coalition to victory in five of 13 states last year and since then has also won two parliamentary by-elections. So far Mr. Anwar has been unable to win enough defections from UMNO to dissolve the government and call new elections. If he succeeds — and if he can get past his July trial for sodomy — he could eventually win the premiership. Mr. Anwar denies the charges and says they are politically motivated, a charge the Malaysian government denies.

In the meantime, UMNO’s moves against the opposition and the press suggest that rather than listening to voters, the ruling party may be growing less tolerant of dissent. Add in the ethnic tensions in Malaysia’s multiracial society — and UNMO’s favored system of preferences for native Malays — and it’s a potentially combustible mix.

Malaysia can’t afford political upheaval now. The country’s economy is being hit hard by the global recession. GDP growth is forecast to contract this quarter after growth of just 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2008, and unemployment is rising. Foreign investors perceive political risk in a country that still locks up its citizens under colonial-era laws like the Internal Security Act. Voters may decide to take it out on Mr. Najib, who was finance minister under Mr. Abdullah, if they don’t see improvement in the economy.

Mr. Najib seems to understand that Malaysians want something new. In a speech Tuesday at the party conference, he promised to end corruption and the politics of patronage and pursue reform; he called for “renewal and regeneration” for UMNO. “Economic progress and better education have directly resulted in the birth of a class of voters who are better informed, very demanding and highly critical,” he said. “If we do not heed this message, their seething anger will become hatred and in the end this may cause them to abandon us altogether.”

Mr. Najib, the son of Malaysia’s second prime minister, entered Parliament at the age of 22. Now 55, he has been groomed for this moment for all of his political life. If the soon-to-be PM truly wants to change his country for the better, he’ll make good on his word, squelch his inner Mahathir, and lead Malaysia down the path of more transparent government and basic freedoms.

The Malaysian Mystery of ValueCap

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew

Are Kuala Lumpur’s rent-seekers raiding the public purse again?

It is Malaysia Inc’s mystery company, a state-owned investment house few seem to want to talk about, much less know about. Rare is the Malaysian who has ever heard of it, knows who comprises its board, the background of its senior management or, indeed, knows much of what it actually does. It doesn’t have a website, and telephone calls to its notional head office go unanswered.

Having any sort of meaningful contact with its elusive executives is near as painful as pulling teeth, as calls, emails and questions go begging, unreturned and unanswered.

When one does actually make contact with the company, which sits at the intersection of Malaysia’s top-level business and politics, its response is one of hostility, to threaten legal action. Even though it is owned by a Malaysian public anxious to know how its money is being handled, its message seems patently clear; stay well away.

Welcome to the secretive world of ValueCap Sdn Bhd, which was forced in late February to extend the maturity date of its US$2.7 billion in bonds for another three years. ValueCap was conceived in 2002 as a Malaysian version of Hong Kong’s Tracker Fund, a powerful device to support the stock market. Three Malaysian government enterprises are behind Valuecap; the main state holding company Khazanah, the state pension trust fund KWAP, and the government’s fund management arm, Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB).

But with funds equal to only around 1 percent of the Malaysian stock market capitalisation compared with the HK fund’s $30 billion war chest, ValueCap seems a poor relation to its northern cousin at the very least, and particularly underfunded at such a tremulous time in the world economy.

But after operating under the radar for most of its six-year history, in recent months ValueCap has had an unwelcome spotlight trained on it by Malaysians wanting to know how more about what their government does. Unused to public scrutiny, the company late last year was debated and attacked in a parliament suddenly full of new opposition faces after last March’s elections which, though won by the long ruling Barisan Nasional ruling coalition, saw the government’s invincibility disappear when it lost more than a third of the seats. Now every aspect of government is under scrutiny, and the bureaucrats don’t seem to like it very much. Indeed, it is becoming a particular problem for Prime Minister-designate Najib Tun Razak, who last November took over the finance ministry, the portfolio ultimately responsible for ValueCap.

The gathering controversy at Valuecap stems from recent revelations that it was supposed to make good a RM5.1 bond repayment to its original shareholders by February, returning the money that was seemingly the capital that Valuecap began life with in 2003. Where that gets messy is that the government acknowledged in October that ValueCap would receive a RM5 billion ‘loan’ from Malaysia’s employee provident fund, which has RM330 billion under management. The government insists the EPF loan is unrelated to the delayed ValueCap bond repayment, and assures that ValueCap is viable. After a spirited November debate in Malaysia’s parliament, deputy finance minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop pledged that the RM5 billion EFP loan would not be used to pay off ValueCap’s loans.

As scant information dribbles out about Valuecap, rousing suspicions of a bailout – strenuously denied by the government – Malaysians now want to know more about what’s going on inside this mystery outfit.

But their problem is the government and its state investment agencies seem intent on not saying much at all. ValueCap resolutely refused to make available details of its portfolio, how it is managed, who advises it or even the resume of its chief executive officer, Sharifatu Laila Syed Ali. Nor will either of its 33 percent shareholders – Khazanah, KWAP and PNB – disclose any details about their status in the ValueCap fund or what, if any, returns they have received from their six year investment.

Inquiries to all four institutions directly responsible for ValueCap hit a circular brick wall. Khazanah spokesman Mohamed Asuki bib Abas said “Valuecap has their own management team and Khazanah as a shareholder could not respond to you on their behalf.” Over at PNB, spokesperson Rosli Ismail said that “with regards to the subject matter, we regret to inform that we decline to comment. C’est la vie.” It was the same at KWAP. “Unfortunately we are not in position to comment on Valuecap,” said its spokeperson.

At ValueCap itself, the response was curiously hostile. “We have strict instructions against disclosing pertinent information of the company,” company secretary Husna Hafiza Mohammed said. “We would not hesitate to take any legal action against you …for any misrepresentations made.”

So why all the secrecy? After all, it was Asia’s crippling 1990′s financial crisis that now prompts Malaysia Inc into claiming that it is going out of its way to be a paragon of transparency and corporate governance, operating under so-called ‘world’s best practices.’ Indeed, in a 2005 interview with Euromoney, Khazanah’s managing director Azman Mokhtar boasted of a new era in transparency and openness at Malaysia’s big sovereign wealth fund.

Senior government officials claim there isn’t any secrecy surrounding ValueCap. Deputy Finance Minister Yakcop told parliament that Valuecap “is run by a team of professionals” and pledged the company “would provide adequate information on the company so long as it did not jeopardise its investment strategies. We have nothing to hide,” he said.

But the message seems to be taking its time to seep through to one of Khazanah’s critical offshoots. Indeed, Khazanah’s short official description of ValueCap is about the most revealing information freely available about this reclusive state-owned enterprise.

“Established in 2002, Valuecap is a fund management company which was created to invest specifically in the Malaysia equities market. Owned jointly by Khazanah, PNB and KWAP, Valuecap’s key mandate is to undertake investments in equities listed on Bursa Malaysia on a portfolio basis, based on superior fundamental investment research.”

What is clear is that ValueCap operates at the upper echelons of Malaysia’s political and business life, sometimes one and the same thing. Documents obtained by Asia Sentinel show the ValueCap board in 2007 to be a gathering of senior ethnic Malay businesspeople and directors, some closely connected to leading politicians and with leading government-linked companies such as the power utility Tenaga Nasional and oil giant Petronas.

A document filed to the Malaysian Securities Commission on June 13 confirms that up ValueCap has a ‘non-current liability’ of RM5.1 billion – which seems to be the shareholders’ bond – as against total assets of RM7.6 billion. Revenue for the year was RM1.3 billion, with profits of RM1.1 billion. Around RM1 million of tax seems to have been paid. The filing was for calendar 2007, long before the current market slump. Malaysia’s KLSE composite index more than doubled in that period from 2002-07.

The lack of detailed public information about ValueCap has incensed both Malaysia’s political opposition and its feisty and well-read blogosphere, fast becoming the credible news and information alternative to the traditionally government-controlled mainstream media. Malaysia’s business and political blogs are scathing about the mysterious fund.

“These buggers are running away with our hard-earned money,” said one blogger. “What is the best and most effective ways we can stop them?” Says another “who knows who gains from this outlay of 5 billion ringgit into the share market. Our government has got to be sincerely good for the people at large; and there has to be transparency.”

At the very least, analysts say the government has a serious perception problem to deal with at ValueCap, at a time it can ill afford further controversy.

Opposition politician Tony Pua has made the pursuit of ValueCap a parliamentary bugbear for the government. With his background in business – Pua is a self-made technology tycoon – he has assumed the role of shadow finance spokesperson opposing the government.

“The real rationale behind the sudden RM5 billion loan from EPF to ValueCap is a mega bail-out of Valuecap,” he says. “The government should stop misleading Malaysians with half-truths. My argument is that this is only supporting shareholders and so it is an inappropriate use of our funds. You are treating the symptoms but not curing the disease, which is your recessionary issues, the health of the economy, the drop in production and so on.”

“The intrinsic health of the company is not going to improve just because you have supported the stock price. This injection into the stock market is an unnecessary action.”

Pua says Valuecap began buying stock in 2003 “when there was no crisis so there was no obvious need for it.” He notes that at RM5 billion, or around 1 percent of the notional Malaysian market capitalisation, the fund isn’t big enough to have a significant impact on the wider market, as it was claimed when it was set up. Moreover, he says there are a number of existing state investment vehicles with a similar function to ValueCap, notably the state pension agency, the Employees Provident Fund, which is providing loans to ValueCap.

After searching through random annual reports – because ValueCap won’t reveal its portfolio details – he notes ValueCap has modest investments in a handful of blue chip Malaysia companies, such as Tenaga and Telkom Malaysia.

Pua says ValueCap was launched with the RM5.1 billion from its three shareholders. He says the ValueCap’s performance over its six-year life, based on its 2007 filing, is “not fantastic” alongside the wider market movement in that time, when the index has more than doubled. “It should’ve done much better,” he says.

He wants Najib to withdraw the EPF injection to ValueCap which, he claims, “serves to only deal with the symptoms of global financial crisis and does not in anyway serve to increase Malaysia’s ability to face the challenges brought about by the crisis.”

“When we discovered that they actually had a RM5.1 billion bond due to expire in February, it completely makes a mockery of whatever they had announced previously that this money was to prop up the stock market as part of a stimulus package to improve the economy.”

“If you want to put it crudely, it’s complete lies, it doesn’t make sense. They can’t raise funds from the stock market to repay their bondholders. What is worse, is that it puts at risk the hard-earned retirement savings of ordinary Malaysians.”

Ramon Navaratnam, the president of the Malaysian chapter of Transparency International, berates the scant level of disclosure at ValueCap, pointing out that it has been journalists and bloggers who have determined what ValueCap owns, not the company’s disclosure.

“I can understand if this was a private investor wishing to keep his identity secret,” Navaratnam says. “But this is the government, its our money that is being risked here. Because it is the government as the custodian of the nation, it should have a greater duty of care to fully disclose what it does with our money.”

“They have to change their mindset, or they pay the price” he says. “Is it any wonder the public can perceive the government to be corrupt or full of cronies if this is how its institutions behave. It is a matter of perception.”

The Valuecap controversy has thrown the government onto the defensive at a time when it is under attack on a number of fronts, particularly over the independence of the judiciary and the prevalence of so-called “money politics,” a Malaysian euphemism for political corruption.

Finance Minister Najib has said ‘money politics’ must be stamped out in Malaysia, a call welcomed by many Malaysians tired of a succession of state bailouts of politically influential business interests. They hope he will prove as good as his word when he becomes PM next month. But Najib himself has had some major distractions. He has spent much of the year defending himself from allegations of involvement in the murder of a Mongolian model who had been in a relationship with one of his key advisors.

The 55-year-old Najib, the eldest son of the late Abdul Razak, Malaysia’s second Prime Minister after its 1957 independence from Britain, seems set to assume the prime ministership his family regards as a birthright after the current PM Abdullah Badawi announced in October he was stepping down at least two years ahead of schedule.

Critics of ValueCap suggest it may have a deeper role than simply being a share market investor, one that touches at the heart of the Malaysian economy. A cornerstone of Mahathirism was the so-called New Economic Policy, an affirmative action program which advantaged Malaysia’s majority ethnic Malay community over the more business-oriented Chinese and Indian minorities. Always controversial, the NEP has anchored the Malaysian economy for much of the last 30 years and confirmed the primacy of the ethnic Malay, or bumiputera, community in the economy. But now the resurgent opposition has called for an end to the NEP, and even senior government officials, notably Najib, have reluctantly conceded the policy needs “review.”

Transparency International’s Navaratnam believes that as Malaysia evolves into a more accountable democracy, long-standing bumiputera interests will find their control of the economy under threat. He believes ‘bumi’ ownership of the economy to be currently between 30 to 40 percent, about double what the government claims it to be.

“Perhaps this company is a vehicle to help maintain that control for the tougher times to come,” he says. “The thing is, we don’t know, the government isn’t saying and that creates an air of distrust.”

Navaratnam notes the tight historical links each of ValueCap’s shareholders have to the bumiputera community. (State fund manager PNB was founded with the stated aim to “enhance the economic wealth of the Bumiputera community in particular and contribute towards the growth and prosperity of the nation for the benefit of Malaysians.”)

In a column for the highly rated Malaysiakini.com headlined “What’s Valuecap’s Real Role?” opposition politician Syed Husin Ali last year urged the government “to give a complete and comprehensive explanation of the background and the true objective of setting up Valuecap.”

“If it fails to do so, then we have no choice but to conclude that the short-term goal is actually to save certain companies and capitalists and also, perhaps more importantly, to raise funds needed by the Barisan Nasional for the next general election.”

Written by Eric Ellis, Asia Sentinel

Balkis dissolved in February

Posted in Malaysia news with tags , on March 26, 2009 by ckchew
By Neville Spykerman

SHAH ALAM, March 25 – Members of the Special Select Committee for Competancy, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) were visibly shocked today when they found out the Wives of Selangor Elected Representatives Charity Organisation (Balkis) had been dissolved on
Feb 11 this year.

The Selangor Registrar of Society (ROS) officer Tairah Yusoff, who was testifying during a public inquiry into the misuse of state funds by Balkis, informed the committee the charity received special exemptions from the Ministry of Home Affairs to enable the
dissolution.

Selangor Speaker Teng Chang Khim who commented on the timing of the dissolution of the scandal-riddled charity, which took place before the start of the public inquiry.

Tairah said she did not know what exemptions were extended to Balkis adding that the decision to dissolve the charity was made in Putrajaya.However, during intense grilling by the committee Tairah admitted to the fact that the Emergency General Meeting (EGM) held by members to dissolve the charity, on March 11, last year was against Balkis’s own constitution.

The office bearers and other members whose husbands lost in the March 8 general election had ceased to be ordinary members by then.

Teng said they immediately became associate members with no voting rights and the  emergency general meeting, on March 11 was illegal and unconstitutional.

Tairah admitted that her office did not scrutinize the composition of Balkis members who attended the EGM and claimed it was not their responsibility.

She further raised the ire of the committee when she said Balkis accounts for 2007 were audited before the charity was allowed to dissolved.

However, earlier today Balkis auditor Yee Chong Kong told the committee that the accounts for the year was not audited.

Yee said repeated reminders to Balkis officer bearers to submit their accounts for auditing were ignored.

Tairah again admitted that she did not check if the accounts submitted by Balkis were audited by an authorized auditor.

Tairah is scheduled to resume her testimony tomorrow.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.